Seasonal and Water Column Trends of the Relative Role of Nitrate and Nitrite as *OH Sources in Surface Waters

2007 ◽  
Vol 97 (8) ◽  
pp. 699-711 ◽  
Author(s):  
Davide Vione ◽  
Claudio Minero ◽  
Valter Maurino ◽  
Ezio Pelizzetti
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yanan Zhao ◽  
Dennis Booge ◽  
Christa A. Marandino ◽  
Cathleen Schlundt ◽  
Astrid Bracher ◽  
...  

Abstract. Our understanding of the biogeochemical cycling of the climate-relevant trace gas dimethylsulfide (DMS) in the Peruvian upwelling system is still limited. Here we present, oceanic and atmospheric DMS measurements which were made during two shipborne cruises in December 2012 (M91) and October 2015 (SO243) in the Peruvian upwelling region. Dimethylsulfoniopropionate (DMSP) and dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) were also measured during M91. Relatively low DMS concentrations were measured in surface waters in October 2015 (1.9 ± 0.9 nmol L−1) and December 2012 (2.5 ± 1.9 nmol L−1). Nutrient availability appeared to be the main driver of the observed variability in the surface DMS distributions in the coastal areas. DMS, DMSP and DMSO showed maxima in the surface layer and no elevated concentrations associated with the oxygen minimum zone off Peru were measured. The possible role of DMS, DMSP and DMSO as radical scavengers (stimulated by nitrogen limitation) is supported by their negative correlations with N : P (sum of nitrate and nitrite: dissolved phosphate) ratios. Large variations in atmospheric DMS mole fractions were measured during M91 (144.6 ± 95.0 ppt) and SO243 (91.4 ± 55.8 ppt); however, the atmospheric mole fractions were generally low, and the sea-to-air flux density was primarily driven by seawater DMS. The Peruvian upwelling region was identified as a source of atmospheric DMS in December 2012 and October 2015, however, in comparison to the global monthly Lana climatology (mean: 6.2–9.8 μmol m−2 d−1 in October/December) (Lana et al., 2011), the Peru upwelling was not a hotspot of DMS emissions at either time (M91: 5.9 ± 5.3 μmol m−2 d−1; SO243: 3.8 ± 2.7 μmol m−2 d−1).


Water ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (13) ◽  
pp. 1812
Author(s):  
Karol Augustowski ◽  
Józef Kukulak

The rate of bank retreat was measured using erosion pins on the alluvial banks of the rivers in the Podhale region (the boundary zone between Central and Outer Carpathians) during the hydrological year 2013/2014. During the winter half-year (November–April), the bank retreat was mainly caused by processes related to the freezing and thawing of the ground (swelling, creep, downfall). During the summer half-year (May–October), fluvial processes and mass movements such as lateral erosion, washing out, and sliding predominated. The share of fluvial processes in the total annual amount of bank retreat (71 cm on average) was 4 times greater than that of the frost phenomena. Erosion on bank surfaces by frost phenomena during the cold half-year was greatest (up to 38 cm) on the upper parts of banks composed of fine-grained alluvium, while fluvial erosion during the summer half-year (exceeding 80 cm) mostly affected the lower parts of the banks, composed of gravel. The precise calculation of the relative role of frost phenomena in the annual balance of bank erosion was precluded at some stations by the loss of erosion pins in the summer flood.


2002 ◽  
Vol 751 ◽  
Author(s):  
Qinglei Wang ◽  
Guoda D. Lian ◽  
Elizabeth C. Dickey

ABSTRACTSolute segregation to grain boundaries is a fundamental phenomenon in polycrystalline metal-oxide electroceramics that has enormous implications for the macroscopic dielectric behavior of the materials. This paper presents a systematic study of solute segregation in a model dielectric, titanium dioxide. We investigate the relative role of the electrostatic versus strain energy driving forces for segregation by studying yttrium-doped specimens. Through analytical transmission electron microscopy studies, we quantitatively determine the segregation behavior of the material. The measured Gibbsian interfacial excesses are compared to thermodynamic predictions.


2009 ◽  
Vol 52 (6) ◽  
pp. 855-868 ◽  
Author(s):  
DuanYang Xu ◽  
XiangWu Kang ◽  
ZhiLi Liu ◽  
DaFang Zhuang ◽  
JianJun Pan

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document