Hydroxychloroquine Use and Cardiovascular Events Among Patients with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Rheumatoid Arthritis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
April Jorge ◽  
Na Lu ◽  
Hyon Choi ◽  
John M. Esdaile ◽  
Diane Lacaille ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Cardiovascular Events ◽  
Systemic Lupus

scholarly journals POS0719 ADVERSE OUTCOMES AND REHOSPITALIZATION AFTER DELIVERY AMONG WOMEN WITH SYSTEMIC LUPUS ERYTHEMATOSUS OR RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS AND THEIR INFANTS

2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 609.1-609
Author(s):  
J. Sabo ◽  
N. Singh ◽  
D. A. Crane ◽  
D. R. Doody ◽  
M. A. Schiff ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Hospital Discharge ◽  
Birth Outcomes ◽  
Gestational Age ◽  
Small For Gestational Age ◽  
Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Adverse Outcomes ◽  
Systemic Lupus ◽  
Cesarean Deliveries

Background:Women with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) or systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) have greater risk of adverse obstetric and birth outcomes than women without these conditions. Infant outcomes are less well-studied. It is unknown whether re-hospitalization after delivery occurs more often for affected mothers and their infants.Objectives:We compared obstetric outcomes among women with and without RA or SLE, and birth outcomes among their infants. Maternal and infant rehospitalizations <2 years of delivery were also compared.Methods:This population-based cohort study used linked birth-hospital discharge data from Washington State for 1987-2014. International Classification of Disease 9th revision (ICD9) codes identified all women with RA (ICD9 714.X, 725.X) and SLE (ICD9 710, 710.0, 710.1) in the hospital discharge record at delivery, and a 10:1 comparison group of women without these codes. Analyses were restricted to singleton live births (1,223 RA; 1,354 SLE). Poisson regression with robust standard errors estimated relative risks (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for selected outcomes, accounting for delivery year, maternal age, and parity.Results:Many adverse outcomes were more common among RA and SLE cases than among comparison women. Preeclampsia occurred more often during pregnancies of women with RA (RR 1.42, 95% CI 1.17-1.71) or SLE (RR 2.33, 95% CI 2.01-2.70), as did preterm rupture of membranes (PROM, RR 2.85, 95% CI 2.20-3.72 for RA; RR 3.28, 95% CI 2.54-4.23 for SLE). Cesarean deliveries were more common among nulliparous women in both groups (RR 1.32, 95% CI 1.18-1.48 for both conditions). Infants of women with RA or SLE were more likely to weigh <2500 g (RR 2.08, 95% CI 1.72-2.52 for RA; RR 4.88, 95% CI 4.27-5.58 for SLE), be small for gestational age (RR 1.25, 95% CI 1.07-2.50; RR 2.30; 2.04-2.59, respectively), delivered at <32 weeks gestation (RR 1.83, 95% CI 1.13-2.97; RR 5.13, 95% CI 3.75-7.01, respectively), and require neonatal intensive care unit admission (NICU, RR 1.89, 95% CI 1.56-2.30; RR 2.71, 95% CI 2.25-3.28, respectively). Infants of women with SLE were more likely to have a malformation (RR 1.46, 95% CI 1.21-1.75) or die within 2 years (RR 2.11, 95% CI 1.21-3.67). Rehospitalization levels among both women with RA (RR 2.22; 1.62-3.04) and SLE (RR 2.78, 95% CI 2.15-3.59) were greatest <6 months of delivery and declined over time. Infants of women with SLE had increased rehospitalization <6 months (RR 1.64, 95% CI 1.36-1.98).Conclusion:Consistent with prior literature, we found women with RA or SLE experienced many adverse outcomes. In our data, these included preeclampsia, PROM, and cesarean deliveries, with increased risks more notable among women with SLE. Infants of women with either condition were more likely to weigh <2500g, be <32 weeks gestation, small for gestational age, and require NICU admission than infants of comparison women. Only infants of women with SLE had increased malformations. Maternal rehospitalization after delivery was more common in both groups; most marked at <6 months. Infant rehospitalizations were increased in both cohorts to a lesser extent. Close follow-up during this time period is crucial to minimize adverse outcomes.Disclosure of Interests:Julianna Sabo: None declared, Namrata Singh: None declared, Deborah A. Crane: None declared, David R. Doody: None declared, Melissa A. Schiff: None declared, Beth A. Mueller Shareholder of: Household owns shares in AstraZeneca

scholarly journals AB0818 ADVERSE EVENTS UNDER B-CELL DIRECTED THERAPIES IN A LARGE SINGLE-CENTER COHORT OF PATIENTS WITH RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS, SYSTEMIC LUPUS ERYTHEMATOSUS, ANCA-ASSOCIATED VASCULITIS AND RENAL DISEASES

2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1433.1-1433
Author(s):  
J. G. Rademacher ◽  
V. Korendovych ◽  
P. Korsten
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Clinical Data ◽  
Lupus Erythematosus ◽  
Infectious Complications ◽  
Single Center ◽  
Systemic Lupus ◽  
Anca Associated Vasculitis

Background:The anti-CD20 antibody rituximab (RTX) is approved for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and ANCA-associated vasculitis (AAV). In addition, RTX is used in a wide range of autoimmune diseases. Belimumab (BEL) is an anti-BAFF antibody approved for the treatment of non-renal systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in Europe. These agents are generally well-tolerated but severe adverse events (AEs) can occur. The frequency of and factors associated with AEs are currently unknown.Objectives:To identify adverse events with the use of B-cell directed therapies in a large population of RA, AAV, and SLE.Methods:This is a single-center retrospective cohort study using routine clinical data over a ten-year period (2010-2020). We recorded epidemiological and clinical data of patients receiving either BEL or RTX. Data included age, gender, type of disease, number and efficacy of infusions, patient-years and concomitant treatment. Patient records were screened for AEs, such as infections, anaphylaxis, occurrence of malignant disease, laboratory abnormalities and immunoglobulin (Ig) deficiency. Between group comparisons were performed.Results:Database screening yielded 445 patients treated with RTX and 23 with BEL. After exclusion of patients with incomplete data, 425 RTX and 23 BEL patients were analyzed.Our preliminary analysis of a sample of 60 of these 448 patients (184 patient-years) resulted in 43 patients (72%) with RA, 8 patients with AAV (13%), 5 patients with a renal disease, and 4 patients with mixed connective tissue disease, as well 23 SLE patients. 46 (77%) were female. In RA, a median of 13 treatments of 1000 mg were administered, corresponding to 3.37 patient-years per patient. Primary non-response occurred in 2 patients, secondary non-response in 13 patients. For AAV, a median of 8.4 treatments were given (3.3 patient-years), no treatment failure was detected. SLE patients received a median of 15 treatments.15 patients had infectious complications during treatment, 11 needed treatment. Herpes zoster infection occurred in 3 patients with RA. Three of the 8 patients with AAV had an infection requiring treatment. In SLE patients, only 2 developed infectious complications, and no Ig-deficiency occurred.Lymphopenia was the most common laboratory abnormality detected in 25 patients with RTX, 19 of whom had RA. Ig deficiency was common in RA, affecting 30% of patients. Deficiency of IgM and IgG was recognized in 5 patients each; 1 patient had low levels IgA.Neither the maintenance prednisolone dosage nor Ig deficiency were associated with risk for infection. However, lymphopenia appeared to be associated with risk for infection.Conclusion:Our preliminary data observe a 184 patient-year period. RTX and BEL were generally associated with few AEs. RA patients frequently had laboratory abnormalities (lymphopenia, Ig-deficiency) which did not necessarily translate to clinical events. Infections were more common in AAV, BEL was the best tolerated B-cell directed agent. Overall, our data are reassuring, but we suggest a more careful vigilance in AAV patients.Disclosure of Interests:Jan-Gerd Rademacher: None declared, Viktor Korendovych: None declared, PETER KORSTEN Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Sanofi Aventis, GSK, Chugai, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Novartis, Consultant of: Lilly, Gilead, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Novartis, GSK, Grant/research support from: GSK

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document