scholarly journals Effects of Osteoarthritis Pain and Concurrent Insomnia and Depression on Health Care Use in a Primary Care Population of Older Adults

2019 ◽  
Vol 71 (6) ◽  
pp. 748-757 ◽  
Author(s):  
Minhui Liu ◽  
Susan M. McCurry ◽  
Basia Belza ◽  
Adrian Dobra ◽  
Diana T. Buchanan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Health Care Use ◽  
Primary Care Population ◽  
Osteoarthritis Pain

scholarly journals A Web-Based eHealth Intervention to Improve the Quality of Life of Older Adults With Multiple Chronic Conditions: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial

10.2196/25175 ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. e25175
Author(s):  
David H Gustafson Sr ◽  
Marie-Louise Mares ◽  
Darcie C Johnston ◽  
Jane E Mahoney ◽  
Randall T Brown ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Older Adults ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Chronic Conditions ◽  
Health Care Use ◽  
Multiple Chronic Conditions ◽  
Secondary Outcomes ◽  
Ehealth Intervention

Background Multiple chronic conditions (MCCs) are common among older adults and expensive to manage. Two-thirds of Medicare beneficiaries have multiple conditions (eg, diabetes and osteoarthritis) and account for more than 90% of Medicare spending. Patients with MCCs also experience lower quality of life and worse medical and psychiatric outcomes than patients without MCCs. In primary care settings, where MCCs are generally treated, care often focuses on laboratory results and medication management, and not quality of life, due in part to time constraints. eHealth systems, which have been shown to improve multiple outcomes, may be able to fill the gap, supplementing primary care and improving these patients’ lives. Objective This study aims to assess the effects of ElderTree (ET), an eHealth intervention for older adults with MCCs, on quality of life and related measures. Methods In this unblinded study, 346 adults aged 65 years and older with at least 3 of 5 targeted high-risk chronic conditions (hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes, osteoarthritis, and BMI ≥30 kg/m2) were recruited from primary care clinics and randomized in a ratio of 1:1 to one of 2 conditions: usual care (UC) plus laptop computer, internet service, and ET or a control consisting of UC plus laptop and internet but no ET. Patients with ET have access for 12 months and will be followed up for an additional 6 months, for a total of 18 months. The primary outcomes of this study are the differences between the 2 groups with regard to measures of quality of life, psychological well-being, and loneliness. The secondary outcomes are between-group differences in laboratory scores, falls, symptom distress, medication adherence, and crisis and long-term health care use. We will also examine the mediators and moderators of the effects of ET. At baseline and months 6, 12, and 18, patients complete written surveys comprising validated scales selected for good psychometric properties with similar populations; laboratory data are collected from eHealth records; health care use and chronic conditions are collected from health records and patient surveys; and ET use data are collected continuously in system logs. We will use general linear models and linear mixed models to evaluate primary and secondary outcomes over time, with treatment condition as a between-subjects factor. Separate analyses will be conducted for outcomes that are noncontinuous or not correlated with other outcomes. Results Recruitment was conducted from January 2018 to December 2019, and 346 participants were recruited. The intervention period will end in June 2021. Conclusions With self-management and motivational strategies, health tracking, educational tools, and peer community and support, ET may help improve outcomes for patients coping with ongoing, complex MCCs. In addition, it may relieve some stress on the primary care system, with potential cost implications. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03387735; https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03387735. International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID) DERR1-10.2196/25175

scholarly journals UNDERSTANDING DEMENTIA PREVALENCE AND HEALTH CARE USE PATTERNS IN RURAL NORTH CAROLINA

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S904-S905
Author(s):  
Amanda N Grant ◽  
Tsai-Ling Liu ◽  
Nigel L Rozario ◽  
Deanna A Mangieri ◽  
Jennifer M Woodward ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Health Care ◽  
North Carolina ◽  
Health Care Use ◽  
Health Care Needs ◽  
Care Needs ◽  
Dementia Prevalence ◽  
Care Services ◽  
Dementia Patients ◽  
Acute Care Services

Abstract Rural and remote communities have limited access to high quality dementia care, prompting a need for innovative solutions to meet the health care needs of affected older adults. As part of a study aimed at implementing a telehealth intervention for primary care patients with dementia in two rural North Carolina counties, we examined baseline dementia prevalence and compared health care use between patients with and without dementia. Electronic health records from January 2018 to December 2018 were examined for 2,288 patients aged 65 or older. A zero-inflated Poisson regression model was used to compare healthcare use between patients with and without dementia adjusting for patients’ demographic and clinical characteristics. Dementia prevalence was 8.7% based on diagnosis codes. Most patients with dementia were women (70%), not married (55%), Medicare-insured (78%), and had more comorbidities (mean: 2±2) than non-dementia patients. Dementia patients had a significantly higher number of primary care visits, emergency department visits, inpatient visits, and preventable hospitalizations than patients without dementia (risk ratio = 1.1, 1.8, 2.18, and 1.3, respectively; all P< 0.05). Dementia burden was higher among women and use of acute care services by patients with dementia in this rural setting was higher than patients without the disease, similar to urban settings. These findings suggest opportunities to improve care coordination and access to resources to help reduce the need for acute care services among patients with dementia and can help tailor interventions to address the health care needs of this group.

scholarly journals Can an Emergency Department–Initiated Intervention Prevent Subsequent Falls and Health Care Use in Older Adults? A Randomized Controlled Trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 76 (6) ◽  
pp. 739-750
Author(s):  
Elizabeth M. Goldberg ◽  
Sarah J. Marks ◽  
Linda J. Resnik ◽  
Sokunvichet Long ◽  
Hannah Mellott ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Emergency Department ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Health Care Use ◽  
Randomized Controlled

scholarly journals Access to primary care and other health care use among western Canadians with chronic conditions: a population-based survey

CMAJ Open ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. E27-E34 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. G. Weaver ◽  
B. J. Manns ◽  
M. Tonelli ◽  
C. Sanmartin ◽  
D. J. T. Campbell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Chronic Conditions ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Health Care Use ◽  
Access To Primary Care ◽  
Population Based Survey

scholarly journals A Usability and Feasibility Study: GENIE - An App Supporting Self-Management among Older Adults who are High Users of the Health Care System (Preprint)

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruta Valaitis ◽  
Laura Cleghorn ◽  
Ivaylo Vassilev ◽  
Anne Rogers ◽  
Jenny Ploeg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Older Adults ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Social Networks ◽  
Social Services ◽  
Health Care System ◽  
Self Management ◽  
Health And Social Services ◽  
Primary Care Clinicians ◽  
Care System

BACKGROUND Primary care providers have been tasked with fostering self-management through managing referrals and linking patients to community-based health and social services. This study evaluated a web-based tool –GENIE (Generating Engagement in Network InvolvEment)– as a component of the Health TAPESTRY program to support self-management of older adults who are high health care system users. GENIE aims to empower patients to leverage their personal social networks to access community services towards reaching their health goals. GENIE maps client’s personal networks, elicits preferences, and filters local health and social resources from a community service directory based on results of a questionnaire that explores client’s interests. In the Health TAPESTRY program, volunteers conducted home visits to gather health information on tablets and implemented the GENIE tool. A report was generated for the primary care team for follow up. OBJECTIVE This study examined the usability, feasibility, and perceived outcomes of the implementation of GENIE with older adults who were enrolled in Ontario’s Health Links Program, which coordinates care for the highest users of the health care system. METHODS This study involved two primary care clinician focus groups, one clinician interview, a volunteer focus group, client telephone interviews, field observations, and GENIE utilization statistics. RESULTS Eight patients, three volunteers, and 16 primary care clinicians participated. Patients were most interested in services that were health-related (exercise and socialization). Overall, participants perceived GENIE to be useful and easy to use, despite challenges related to email set up, disease terminology, instructions for personal network mapping, and clarity of questionnaire items. Volunteer facilitation was critical to support implementation of Genie. Tool completion averaged 39 minutes. Almost all patients identified a community program or activity of interest using GENIE. Half followed up on health and social services and added new members to their network over 6 months, while one participant lost a member. Clinicians had concerns about accuracy, suitability, and quantity of suggested programs and services generated from the tool and believed that they could better tailor choices for their patients highlighting the inherent tension between user-centred preferences focused on capabilities and bio-medical definitions of need shaping professional judgement. However, clinicians did note that GENIE strengthened their understanding of patients’ personal social networks. CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrated GENIE’s potential, facilitated by volunteers, to expand patients’ social networks and link them to relevant health and social services to support self-management. Volunteers require training to effectively implement GENIE for self-management support and can help overcome time limitations that primary care clinicians face. Refining the filtering capability of GENIE to allow for better tailoring of results to address the complex needs of those who are high system users may help to improve primary care provider’s confidence in such tools. CLINICALTRIAL Not applicable

scholarly journals Impacts of mild COVID-19 on elevated use of primary and specialist health care services: A nationwide register study from Norway

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (10) ◽  
pp. e0257926
Author(s):  
Katrine Damgaard Skyrud ◽  
Kjersti Helene Hernæs ◽  
Kjetil Elias Telle ◽  
Karin Magnusson
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Health Care Services ◽  
Age Groups ◽  
Relative Difference ◽  
Health Care Use ◽  
Positive Test ◽  
Specialist Care ◽  
Care Services ◽  
Specialist Health Care

Aim To explore the temporal impact of mild COVID-19 on need for primary and specialist health care services. Methods In all adults (≥20 years) tested for SARS-CoV-2 in Norway March 1st 2020 to February 1st 2021 (N = 1 401 922), we contrasted the monthly all-cause health care use before and up to 6 months after the test (% relative difference), for patients with a positive test for SARS-CoV-2 (non-hospitalization, i.e. mild COVID-19) and patients with a negative test (no COVID-19). Results We found a substantial short-term elevation in primary care use in all age groups, with men generally having a higher relative increase (men 20–44 years: 522%, 95%CI = 509–535, 45–69 years: 439%, 95%CI = 426–452, ≥70 years: 199%, 95%CI = 180–218) than women (20–44 years: 342, 95%CI = 334–350, 45–69 years = 375, 95%CI = 365–385, ≥70 years: 156%, 95%CI = 141–171) at 1 month following positive test. At 2 months, this sex difference was less pronounced, with a (20–44 years: 21%, 95%CI = 13–29, 45–69 years = 38%, 95%CI = 30–46, ≥70 years: 15%, 95%CI = 3–28) increase in primary care use for men, and a (20–44 years: 30%, 95%CI = 24–36, 45–69 years = 57%, 95%CI = 50–64, ≥70 years: 14%, 95%CI = 4–24) increase for women. At 3 months after test, only women aged 45–70 years still had an increased primary care use (14%, 95%CI = 7–20). The increase was due to respiratory- and general/unspecified conditions. We observed no long-term (4–6 months) elevation in primary care use, and no elevation in specialist care use. Conclusion Mild COVID-19 gives an elevated need for primary care that vanishes 2–3 months after positive test. Middle-aged women had the most prolonged increased primary care use.

scholarly journals Rotavirus disease and health care utilisation among children under 5 years of age in highly developed countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cristina Ardura-Garcia ◽  
Christian Kreis ◽  
Milenko Rakic ◽  
Manon Jaboyedoff ◽  
Maria Christina Mallet ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Nosocomial Infections ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Developed Countries ◽  
Incidence Rates ◽  
Health Care Use ◽  
Ed Visits ◽  
Children Under 5

AbstractBackgroundRotavirus (RV) infection is the leading cause of diarrhoea-associated morbidity and mortality globally among children under 5 years of age. RV vaccination is available, but has not been implemented in many national immunisation plans, especially in highly developed countries. This systematic review aimed to estimate the prevalence and incidence of health care use for RV gastroenteritis (RVGE) among children aged under 5 years in highly developed countries without routine RV vaccination.MethodsWe searched MEDLINE and Embase databases from January 1st 2000 to December 17th 2018 for publications reporting on incidence or prevalence of RVGE-related health care use in children below 5 years of age: primary care and emergency department (ED) visits, hospitalisations, nosocomial infections and deaths. We included only studies with laboratory-confirmed RV infection, undertaken in highly developed countries with no RV routine vaccination plans. We used random effects meta-analysis to generate summary estimates with 95% confidence intervals (CI) and prediction intervals.ResultsWe screened 4033 abstracts and included 74 studies from 21 countries. Average incidence rates of RVGE per 100 000 person-years were: 2484 (95% CI 697-5366) primary care visits, 1890 (1597-2207) ED visits, 500 (422-584) hospitalisations, 34 (20-51) nosocomial infections and 0.04 (0.02-0.07) deaths. Average proportions of cases of acute gastroenteritis caused by RV were: 21% (95% CI 16-26%) for primary care visits; 32% (25-38%) for ED visits; 41% (36-47%) for hospitalisations, 29% (25-34%) for nosocomial infections and 12% (8-18%) for deaths. Results varied widely between and within countries, and heterogeneity was high (I2>90%) in most models.ConclusionRV in children under 5 years causes many healthcare visits and hospitalisations, with low mortality, in highly developed countries without routine RV vaccination. The health care use estimates for RVGE obtained by this study can be used to model RV vaccine cost-effectiveness in highly developed countries.Take home messageRV-caused illness leads to a high burden of health care usage in highly developed countries who have not introduced RV vaccination.

scholarly journals CHOICE: Choosing Health Options In Chronic Care Emergencies

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (13) ◽  
pp. 1-272 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elspeth Guthrie ◽  
Cara Afzal ◽  
Claire Blakeley ◽  
Amy Blakemore ◽  
Rachel Byford ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Health Economic ◽  
At Risk ◽  
Psychosocial Factors ◽  
Research Programme ◽  
Health Care Use ◽  
Feasibility Trial ◽  
Unscheduled Care ◽  
Prior Use

BackgroundOver 70% of the health-care budget in England is spent on the care of people with long-term conditions (LTCs), and a major cost component is unscheduled health care. Psychological morbidity is high in people with LTCs and is associated with a range of adverse outcomes, including increased mortality, poorer physical health outcomes, increased health costs and service utilisation.ObjectivesThe aim of this programme of research was to examine the relationship between psychological morbidity and use of unscheduled care in people with LTCs, and to develop a psychosocial intervention that would have the potential to reduce unscheduled care use. We focused largely on emergency hospital admissions (EHAs) and attendances at emergency departments (EDs).DesignA three-phase mixed-methods study. Research methods included systematic reviews; a longitudinal prospective cohort study in primary care to identify people with LTCs at risk of EHA or ED admission; a replication study in primary care using routinely collected data; an exploratory and feasibility cluster randomised controlled trial in primary care; and qualitative studies to identify personal reasons for the use of unscheduled care and factors in routine consultations in primary care that may influence health-care use. People with lived experience of LTCs worked closely with the research team.SettingPrimary care. Manchester and London.ParticipantsPeople aged ≥ 18 years with at least one of four common LTCs: asthma, coronary heart disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and diabetes. Participants also included health-care staff.ResultsEvidence synthesis suggested that depression, but not anxiety, is a predictor of use of unscheduled care in patients with LTCs, and low-intensity complex interventions reduce unscheduled care use in people with asthma and COPD. The results of the prospective study were that depression, not having a partner and life stressors, in addition to prior use of unscheduled care, severity of illness and multimorbidity, were independent predictors of EHA and ED admission. Approximately half of the cost of health care for people with LTCs was accounted for by use of unscheduled care. The results of the replication study, carried out in London, broadly supported our findings for risk of ED attendances, but not EHAs. This was most likely due to low rates of detection of depression in general practitioner (GP) data sets. Qualitative work showed that patients were reluctant to use unscheduled care, deciding to do so when they perceived a serious and urgent need for care, and following previous experience that unscheduled care had successfully and unquestioningly met similar needs in the past. In general, emergency and primary care doctors did not regard unscheduled care as problematic. We found there are missed opportunities to identify and discuss psychosocial issues during routine consultations in primary care due to the ‘overmechanisation’ of routine health-care reviews. The feasibility trial examined two levels of an intervention for people with COPD: we tried to improve the way in which practices manage patients with COPD and developed a targeted psychosocial treatment for patients at risk of using unscheduled care. The former had low acceptability, whereas the latter had high acceptability. Exploratory health economic analyses suggested that the practice-level intervention would be unlikely to be cost-effective, limiting the value of detailed health economic modelling.LimitationsThe findings of this programme may not apply to all people with LTCs. It was conducted in an area of high social deprivation, which may limit the generalisability to more affluent areas. The response rate to the prospective longitudinal study was low. The feasibility trial focused solely on people with COPD.ConclusionsPrior use of unscheduled care is the most powerful predictor of unscheduled care use in people with LTCs. However, psychosocial factors, particularly depression, are important additional predictors of use of unscheduled care in patients with LTCs, independent of severity and multimorbidity. Patients and health-care practitioners are unaware that psychosocial factors influence health-care use, and such factors are rarely acknowledged or addressed in consultations or discussions about use of unscheduled care. A targeted patient intervention for people with LTCs and comorbid depression has shown high levels of acceptability when delivered in a primary care context. An intervention at the level of the GP practice showed little evidence of acceptability or cost-effectiveness.Future workThe potential benefits of case-finding for depression in patients with LTCs in primary care need to be evaluated, in addition to further evaluation of the targeted patient intervention.FundingThe National Institute for Health Research Programme Grants for Applied Research programme.

Home-Based Care and Primary Care Settings for Delivery of Geropsychology Services to Older Persons

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Srijana Shrestha
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Older Adults ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Mental Health Care ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Mental Illnesses ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Primary Care Clinics ◽  
Home Based

Despite high rates of mental illnesses, older adults face multiple barriers in accessing mental health care. Primary care clinics, and home- and community-based senior-serving agencies are settings where older adults routinely receive medical care and social services. Therefore, integration of mental health care with existing service delivery systems can improve access to mental health services and reduce the unmet mental health needs of seniors. Evidence suggests that with innovative components mental health provided in collaboration with primary care providers with or without co-location within primary care clinics can improve depression and anxiety. Home-based models for depression care are also effective, but more research is needed in examining home-based approaches in late-life anxiety treatment. It is noteworthy that integrative models are particularly helpful in expanding the reach in underserved communities: elders from minority and low-income backgrounds and homebound seniors.

Multidimensional Social Support and Health Services Utilization Among Noninstitutionalized Older Persons in Ghana

2018 ◽  
Vol 32 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 227-239 ◽  
Author(s):  
Razak M. Gyasi ◽  
David R. Phillips ◽  
Padmore Adusei Amoah
Keyword(s):  
Social Support ◽  
Older Adults ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Health Services ◽  
Health Services Utilization ◽  
Community Dwelling ◽  
Health Care Use ◽  
Care Utilization ◽  
Health Seeking ◽  
Services Utilization

Objectives: This study examines multidimensional social supports as predictors of health services utilization among community-dwelling older Ghanaians. Method: Using data from a 2016/2017 Aging, Health, Psychological Wellbeing and Health-Seeking Behavior Study ( N = 1,200), Poisson regression models estimated the associations of aspects of informal social support and health facility utilization among older people. Results: Findings suggest that regular contacts with family/close friends (odds ratio [OR] = 1.299; 95% confidence interval [CI] = [1.111, 1.519]), social participation (OR = 1.021; 95% CI = [1.140, 1.910]), and remittances from adult children (OR = 1.091; 95%CI = [1.086, 1.207]) were associated with increased health services utilization with some gender variations. Having caregivers increased health care use generally (OR = 1.108; 95% CI = [1.016, 1.209]) and among men (OR = 1.181; 95% CI = [1.015, 1.373]). However, we found decrease in health care use among those who received pecuniary assistance (OR = 0.893; 95% CI = [0.805, 0.990]). Discussion: Perceived structural and functional social support domains appear influential in health care utilization among older adults in Ghana. The findings underscore the need for intervention programs and social policies targeted at both micro-factors and wider social factors, including the novel area of remittances to older adults.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document