scholarly journals Mini-Residency in Musculoskeletal Care: An Interprofessional, Mixed-Methods Educational Initiative for Primary Care Providers

2016 ◽  
Vol 68 (2) ◽  
pp. 275-279 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael J. Battistone ◽  
Andrea M. Barker ◽  
Phillip Lawrence ◽  
Marissa P. Grotzke ◽  
Grant W. Cannon
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Educational Initiative ◽  
Musculoskeletal Care

scholarly journals Engaging primary care providers in managing pediatric eating disorders: a mixed methods study

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jocelyn Lebow ◽  
Cassandra Narr ◽  
Angela Mattke ◽  
Janna R. Gewirtz O’Brien ◽  
Marcie Billings ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Eating Disorders ◽  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Care Setting ◽  
Primary Care Setting ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Mixed Methods Study ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Evidence Based Treatment

Abstract Background The primary care setting offers an attractive opportunity for, not only the identification of pediatric eating disorders, but also the delivery of evidence-based treatment. However, constraints of this setting pose barriers for implementing treatment. For interventions to be successful, they need to take into consideration the perspectives of stakeholders. As such, the purpose of this study was to examine in-depth primary care providers’ perspective of challenges to identifying and managing eating disorders in the primary care setting. Methods This mixed methods study surveyed 60 Pediatric and Family Medicine providers across 6 primary care practices. Sixteen of these providers were further interviewed using a qualitative, semi-structured interview. Results Providers (n = 60, response rate of 45%) acknowledged the potential of primary care as a point of contact for early identification and treatment of pediatric eating disorders. They also expressed that this was an area of need in their practices. They identified numerous barriers to successful implementation of evidence-based treatment in this setting including scarcity of time, knowledge, and resources. Conclusions Investigations seeking to build capacities in primary care settings to address eating disorders must address these barriers.

scholarly journals What matters most to patients about primary healthcare: mixed-methods patient priority setting exercises within the PREFeR (PRioritiEs For Research) project

BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (7) ◽  
pp. e025954 ◽  
Author(s):  
Louisa Edwards ◽  
Melody Monro ◽  
Yaron Butterfield ◽  
Ravin Johl ◽  
Kent Cadogan Loftsgard ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Priority Setting ◽  
Primary Healthcare ◽  
Health Resources ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Online Surveys ◽  
Care Research

ObjectivesTo identify patient-generated priority topics for future primary care research in British Columbia (BC), Canada within a diverse patient population.DesignMixed-methods priority setting exercises framed by the dialogue model, using the nominal group technique (rank-ordered scoring) and province-wide online surveys capturing importance ratings of the top 10 primary healthcare topics from patients and primary care providers.SettingBC, Canada.ParticipantsTopic identification was completed by 10 patient partners (7 female, 3 male) from the BC Primary Health Care Research Network Patient Advisory; online surveys were completed by 464 patients and 173 primary care providers.ResultsThe 10 members recruited to the patient advisory provided over 80 experiences of what stood out for them in BC primary care, which were grouped thematically into 18 topics, 10 of which were retained in province-wide surveys. Top-rated survey topics for both patients (n=464) and providers (n=173) included being unable to find a regular family doctor/other primary healthcare provider, support for living with chronic conditions, mental health resources and information sharing, including electronic medical records. However, all 10 topics were rated important, on average, by both groups.ConclusionsThe current project activities demonstrate the feasibility of including patients in priority setting exercises for primary healthcare in general, rather than focusing on a condition-specific population or disease area. There was considerable overlap between patient-generated topics and topics previously identified by other stakeholders, but patients identified two additional topics (mental health resources, improve and strengthen patient–provider communication). More similarities than differences in topic importance between patients and providers emerged in the online surveys. The project activities that follow (rapid literature reviews, multistakeholder dialogue) will highlight under-researched topics and inform the development of specific research questions.

scholarly journals Primary Care Physician Experiences with Integrated Population-Scale Genetic Testing: A Mixed-Methods Assessment

2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 165
Author(s):  
Amy A. Lemke ◽  
Laura M. Amendola ◽  
Kristine Kuchta ◽  
Henry M. Dunnenberger ◽  
Jennifer Thompson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Genetic Testing ◽  
Data Privacy ◽  
Qualitative Interviews ◽  
Genomic Medicine ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
The United States ◽  
Care Physician ◽  
Care Providers

The scalable delivery of genomic medicine requires collaboration between genetics and non-genetics providers. Thus, it is essential to investigate and address the perceived value of and barriers to incorporating genetic testing into the clinical practice of primary care providers (PCPs). We used a mixed-methods approach of qualitative interviews and surveys to explore the experience of PCPs involved in the pilot DNA-10K population genetic testing program. Similar to previous research, PCPs reported low confidence with tasks related to ordering, interpreting and managing the results of genetic tests, and identified the need for additional education. PCPs endorsed high levels of utility for patients and their families but noted logistical challenges to incorporating genetic testing into their practice. Overall PCPs were not familiar with the United States’ Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act and they expressed high levels of concern for patient data privacy and potential insurance discrimination. This PCP feedback led to the development and implementation of several processes to improve the PCP experience with the DNA-10K program. These results contribute to the knowledge base regarding genomic implementation using a mixed provider model and may be beneficial for institutions developing similar clinical programs.

scholarly journals Integrated Smoking Cessation for Smokers With Serious Mental Illness: Protocol for a Convergent Mixed Methods Implementation Evaluation Study

10.2196/25390 ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (7) ◽  
pp. e25390
Author(s):  
Kristina Schnitzer ◽  
Melissa Culhane Maravić ◽  
Diana Arntz ◽  
Nathaniel L Phillips ◽  
Gladys Pachas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Mental Illness ◽  
Smoking Cessation ◽  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Serious Mental Illness ◽  
Qualitative Data ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Pragmatic Clinical Trial ◽  
Implementation Evaluation

Background Tobacco smoking is associated with significant morbidity and premature mortality in individuals with serious mental illness. A 2-year pragmatic clinical trial (PCORI PCS-1504-30472) that enrolled 1100 individuals with serious mental illness in the greater Boston area was conducted to test 2 interventions for tobacco cessation for individuals with serious mental illness: (1) academic detailing, which delivers education to primary care providers and highlights first-line pharmacotherapy for smoking cessation, and (2) provision of community health worker support to smoker participants. Implementing and scaling this intervention in other settings will require the systematic identification of barriers and facilitators, as well as the identification of relevant subgroups, effective and unique components, and setting-specific factors. Objective This protocol outlines the proposed mixed methods evaluation of the pragmatic clinical trial to (1) identify barriers and facilitators to effective implementation of the interventions, (2) examine group differences among primary care physicians, and (3) identify barriers that stakeholders such as clinical, payor, and policy leaders would anticipate to impact the implementation of effective components of the intervention. Methods Qualitative interviews will be conducted with all study community health workers and selected smoker participants, primary care providers, and other stakeholders. Measures of performance and engagement will guide purposive sampling. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research will guide qualitative data collection and analysis in accordance with the following framework approach: (1) familiarization, (2) identifying a thematic framework, (3) indexing, (4) charting, and (5) mapping and interpretation. Joint display analyses will be constructed to analyze and draw conclusions across the quantitative and qualitative data. Results The 3-year cluster-randomized trial has concluded, and the analysis of primary outcomes is underway. Results from the pragmatic trial and this mixed methods implementation evaluation will be used to help disseminate, scale, and expand a systems intervention. Conclusions The results of this mixed methods implementation evaluation will inform strategies for dissemination and solutions to potential barriers to the implementation of interventions from a smoking cessation trial for individuals with serious mental illness. International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID) DERR1-10.2196/25390

scholarly journals Integrated Smoking Cessation for Smokers With Serious Mental Illness: Protocol for a Convergent Mixed Methods Implementation Evaluation Study (Preprint)

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristina Schnitzer ◽  
Melissa Culhane Maravić ◽  
Diana Arntz ◽  
Nathaniel L Phillips ◽  
Gladys Pachas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Mental Illness ◽  
Smoking Cessation ◽  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Serious Mental Illness ◽  
Qualitative Data ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Pragmatic Clinical Trial ◽  
Implementation Evaluation

BACKGROUND Tobacco smoking is associated with significant morbidity and premature mortality in individuals with serious mental illness. A 2-year pragmatic clinical trial (PCORI PCS-1504-30472) that enrolled 1100 individuals with serious mental illness in the greater Boston area was conducted to test 2 interventions for tobacco cessation for individuals with serious mental illness: (1) academic detailing, which delivers education to primary care providers and highlights first-line pharmacotherapy for smoking cessation, and (2) provision of community health worker support to smoker participants. Implementing and scaling this intervention in other settings will require the systematic identification of barriers and facilitators, as well as the identification of relevant subgroups, effective and unique components, and setting-specific factors. OBJECTIVE This protocol outlines the proposed mixed methods evaluation of the pragmatic clinical trial to (1) identify barriers and facilitators to effective implementation of the interventions, (2) examine group differences among primary care physicians, and (3) identify barriers that stakeholders such as clinical, payor, and policy leaders would anticipate to impact the implementation of effective components of the intervention. METHODS Qualitative interviews will be conducted with all study community health workers and selected smoker participants, primary care providers, and other stakeholders. Measures of performance and engagement will guide purposive sampling. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research will guide qualitative data collection and analysis in accordance with the following framework approach: (1) familiarization, (2) identifying a thematic framework, (3) indexing, (4) charting, and (5) mapping and interpretation. Joint display analyses will be constructed to analyze and draw conclusions across the quantitative and qualitative data. RESULTS The 3-year cluster-randomized trial has concluded, and the analysis of primary outcomes is underway. Results from the pragmatic trial and this mixed methods implementation evaluation will be used to help disseminate, scale, and expand a systems intervention. CONCLUSIONS The results of this mixed methods implementation evaluation will inform strategies for dissemination and solutions to potential barriers to the implementation of interventions from a smoking cessation trial for individuals with serious mental illness. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT DERR1-10.2196/25390

scholarly journals A mixed-methods examination of communication between oncologists and primary care providers among primary care physicians in underserved communities

Cancer ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 121 (6) ◽  
pp. 908-915 ◽  
Author(s):  
Megan Johnson Shen ◽  
Maria Binz-Scharf ◽  
Tom D'Agostino ◽  
Natasha Blakeney ◽  
Elisa Weiss ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Primary Care Physicians ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Underserved Communities
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document