scholarly journals Physicians' explanations for apparent gaps in the quality of rheumatology care: Results from the US Medicare Physician Quality Reporting System

2013 ◽  
Vol 65 (2) ◽  
pp. 235-243 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey R. Curtis ◽  
Pradeep Sharma ◽  
Tarun Arora ◽  
Aseem Bharat ◽  
Itara Barnes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Reporting System ◽  
Quality Reporting ◽  
The Us ◽  
Physician Quality Reporting System

scholarly journals Physician Quality Reporting System Program Updates and the Impact on Emergency Medicine Practice

2016 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 229-237 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer Wiler ◽  
Michael Granovsky ◽  
Stephen Cantrill ◽  
Richard Newell ◽  
Arjun Venkatesh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Medicine ◽  
Reporting System ◽  
Quality Reporting ◽  
Physician Quality Reporting System ◽  
The Impact ◽  
System Program

Assessing Resident Cataract Surgery Outcomes Using Medicare Physician Quality Reporting System Measures

2016 ◽  
Vol 73 (5) ◽  
pp. 774-779 ◽  
Author(s):  
Avni P. Finn ◽  
Sheila Borboli-Gerogiannis ◽  
Stacey Brauner ◽  
Han-Ying Peggy Chang ◽  
Sherleen Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cataract Surgery ◽  
Reporting System ◽  
Quality Reporting ◽  
Physician Quality Reporting System ◽  
Surgery Outcomes

Pathologists’ Participation and Performance in the Medicare Physician Quality Reporting System

2019 ◽  
Vol 152 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S141-S141
Author(s):  
Li Ge ◽  
Xinliang Liu
Keyword(s):  
Reporting System ◽  
Quality Metrics ◽  
Medical Graduate ◽  
Quality Data ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Patient Privacy ◽  
Incentive Payment ◽  
Quality Reporting ◽  
Physician Quality Reporting System ◽  
And Performance

Abstract Objectives Public reporting of quality metrics has become increasingly important for pathologists to demonstrate excellence of care and to secure value-based payments from both public and private payers. This study evaluated the participation and performance of pathologists in the Medicare Physician Quality Reporting System (PQRS). Methods This study conducted a retrospective review of the Physician Compare data files from 2016. Specifically, pathologists enrolled in the Physician Compare Initiative were identified and merged with quality data using uniquely assigned National Provider Identifiers. Descriptive statistics and multiple logistic regression were performed using Stata (version 12.1) statistical software (StataCorp, College Station, TX). Results Among the 11,637 pathologists identified in the Physician Compare Initiative, 8,408 pathologists (73.3%) participated in the PQRS. Regression analysis indicated that female gender, foreign medical graduate (FMG), and a larger number of employees in the affiliated organization were associated with a lower likelihood of participating in the PQRS. To protect patient privacy, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) only released the quality metrics of 353 pathologists, which were computed based on 20 or more Medicare beneficiaries. The three most commonly reported quality metrics included PQRS#249 Barrett’s Esophagus, PQRS#395 Lung Cancer Reporting (Biopsy/Cytology Specimens), and PQRS#397 Melanoma Reporting. The mean performance rates for the three most common metrics were 98.8% (SD 8.3%), 96.8% (SD 11.9%), and 97.4% (SD 6.9%), respectively. Conclusion A majority of pathologists participated in the Medicare PQRS program in 2016. The performance rates of public available quality metrics remained at high levels with significant variations in some metrics. Future research should examine the quality performance of pathologists as they transition from the PQRS to the Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS) under the Quality Payment Program.

scholarly journals Physician Quality Reporting System

2011 ◽  
Vol 32 (11) ◽  
pp. 2000-2001 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Anumula ◽  
P.C. Sanelli
Keyword(s):  
Reporting System ◽  
Quality Reporting ◽  
Physician Quality Reporting System
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document