scholarly journals Measures of foot function, foot health, and foot pain: American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons Lower Limb Outcomes Assessment: Foot and Ankle Module (AAOS-FAM), Bristol Foot Score (BFS), Revised Foot Function Index (FFI-R), Foot Health Status Questionnair

2011 ◽  
Vol 63 (S11) ◽  
pp. S229-S239 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jody L. Riskowski ◽  
Thomas J. Hagedorn ◽  
Marian T. Hannan
Author(s):  
Francisco Javier Domínguez-Muñoz ◽  
Miguel Angel Garcia-Gordillo ◽  
Rodrigo Anibal Diaz-Torres ◽  
Miguel Ángel Hernandez-Mocholi ◽  
Santos Villafaina ◽  
...  

Background and objectives: Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) is a chronic disease characterized by hyperglycemia. T2DM affects millions of people, and has a lot of complications such as impaired sensation in the feet. Moreover, it is important to know the health of the feet of people with T2DM. The aim of this study is to know the preliminary values of the Foot Health Status Questionnaire (FHSQ) in people with T2DM. Materials and Methods: A total of 87 patients with T2DM with an average age of 65.56 years, divided in 54 men and 33 women, participated in this cross-sectional study. The main outcome was the health of the foot as measured by the FHSQ questionnaire. This questionnaire collects data on eight dimensions: Foot Pain, Foot Function, Shoe, General Foot Health, General Health, Physical Activity, Social Capacity, and Vigor. Results: Patients with T2DM have lower values in Foot Pain; median values in General Foot Health and high values in Foot Function, Shoe, Physical Activity and Social Capacity. Some of these dimensions are affected by age, diabetes control, Body Mass Index (BMI), and years of diagnosis. Females with T2DM have more problems than males in the Shoe, General Foot Health, Physical Activity and Vigor dimensions. Conclusions: this research gives us preliminary values of the FHSQ in Spanish patients with T2DM and divided by gender, age, diabetes control, BMI, and years of diagnosis in people with T2DM.


1998 ◽  
Vol 88 (9) ◽  
pp. 419-428 ◽  
Author(s):  
PJ Bennett ◽  
C Patterson ◽  
S Wearing ◽  
T Baglioni

The aim of this study was to apply the principles of content, criterion, and construct validation to a new questionnaire specifically designed to measure foot-health status. One hundred eleven subjects completed two different questionnaires designed to measure foot health (the new Foot Health Status Questionnaire and the previously validated Foot Function Index) and underwent a clinical examination in order to provide data for a second-order confirmatory factor analysis. Presented herein is a psychometrically evaluated questionnaire that contains 13 items covering foot pain, foot function, footwear, and general foot health. The tool demonstrates a high degree of content, criterion, and construct validity and test-retest reliability.


2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jane S. S. P. Ferreira ◽  
João P. Panighel ◽  
Érica Q. Silva ◽  
Renan L. Monteiro ◽  
Ronaldo H. Cruvinel Júnior ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The stratification system from the International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot (IWGDF) was used to classify the participants as to the ulcer risk. However, it is not yet known what the classification groups’ individual deficits are regarding sensitivity, function, and musculoskeletal properties and mechanics. This makes it difficult to design proper ulcer prevention strategies for patients. Thus, this study aimed to investigate the foot function, foot strength and health of people with diabetes mellitus (DM)—with or without DPN—while considering the different ulcer risk classifications determined by the IWGDF. Methods The subject pool comprised 72 people with DM, with and without DPN. The patients were divided into three groups: Group 0 (G0), which comprised diabetic patients without DPN; Group 1 (G1), which comprised patients with DPN; and Group 2 (G2), which comprised patients with DPN who had foot deformities. The health and foot function of the subjects’ feet were assessed using a foot health status questionnaire (FHSQ-BR) that investigated four domains: foot pain, foot function, footwear, and general foot health. The patients’ foot strength was evaluated using the maximum force under each subject’s hallux and toes on a pressure platform (emed q-100, Novel, Munich, Germany). Results Moderate differences were found between G0 and G1 and G2 for the foot pain, foot function, general foot health, and footwear. There was also a small but significant difference between G0 and G2 in regards to hallux strength. Conclusion Foot health, foot function and strength levels of people with DM and DPN classified by the ulcer risk are different and this must be taken into account when evaluating and developing treatment strategies for these patients.


2020 ◽  
Vol 72 (S10) ◽  
pp. 294-320
Author(s):  
Glen A. Whittaker ◽  
Shannon E. Munteanu ◽  
Edward Roddy ◽  
Hylton B. Menz
Keyword(s):  

1991 ◽  
Vol 44 (6) ◽  
pp. 561-570 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elly Budiman-Mak ◽  
Kendon J. Conrad ◽  
Kathryn E. Roach

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document