Verbal overshadowing: a sound theory in voice recognition?

2005 ◽  
Vol 19 (9) ◽  
pp. 1127-1144 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thea Vanags ◽  
Marie Carroll ◽  
Timothy J. Perfect
2002 ◽  
Vol 16 (8) ◽  
pp. 973-980 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy J. Perfect ◽  
Laura J. Hunt ◽  
Christopher M. Harris

1997 ◽  
Author(s):  
Craig B. Neely ◽  
Jeffrey R. Wilson ◽  
Brian H. Bornstein
Keyword(s):  

1982 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gary K. Poock ◽  
Norman D. Schwalm ◽  
Ellen F. Roland

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Siegfried Ludwig Sporer ◽  
Maike C. Davids ◽  
Kristina Sabine Kaminski ◽  
Dawn McQuiston
Keyword(s):  

Author(s):  
Jeffrey A. Daniels ◽  
Maria J. Amores ◽  
Jennifer Haist ◽  
Susan Chamberlain ◽  
Karianne Bilsky ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (01) ◽  
pp. 20-25
Author(s):  
Indra Saputra ◽  
Parulian Silalahi ◽  
Bayu Cahyawan ◽  
Imam Akbar

Bicycles are not equipped with the turn signal. For driving safety, a bicycle helmet with a turn signal is designed with voice rrecognition. It is using the Arduino Nano as a controller to control the ON and OFF of turn signal lights with voice commands. This device uses a Voice Recognition sensor and microphone that placed on a bicycle helmet. When the voice command is mentioned in the microphone, the Voice Recognition sensor will detect the command specified, the sensor will automatically read and send a signal to Arduino, then the turn signal will light up as instructed, the Arduino on the helmet will send an indicator signal via the Bluetooth Module. The device is able to detect sound with a percentage of 80%. The tool can work with a distance of <2 meters with noise <71 db.


Author(s):  
David Estlund

Throughout the history of political philosophy and politics, there has been continual debate about the roles of idealism versus realism. For contemporary political philosophy, this debate manifests in notions of ideal theory versus nonideal theory. Nonideal thinkers shift their focus from theorizing about full social justice, asking instead which feasible institutional and political changes would make a society more just. Ideal thinkers, on the other hand, question whether full justice is a standard that any society is likely ever to satisfy. And, if social justice is unrealistic, are attempts to understand it without value or importance, and merely utopian? This book argues against thinking that justice must be realistic, or that understanding justice is only valuable if it can be realized. The book does not offer a particular theory of justice, nor does it assert that justice is indeed unrealizable—only that it could be, and this possibility upsets common ways of proceeding in political thought. The book's author engages critically with important strands in traditional and contemporary political philosophy that assume a sound theory of justice has the overriding, defining task of contributing practical guidance toward greater social justice. Along the way, it counters several tempting perspectives, including the view that inquiry in political philosophy could have significant value only as a guide to practical political action, and that understanding true justice would necessarily have practical value, at least as an ideal arrangement to be approximated. Demonstrating that unrealistic standards of justice can be both sound and valuable to understand, the book stands as a trenchant defense of ideal theory in political philosophy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document