scholarly journals Examining explanations for the link between bullying perpetration and physical dating violence perpetration: Do they vary by bullying victimization?

2015 ◽  
Vol 42 (1) ◽  
pp. 66-81 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vangie A. Foshee ◽  
Thad S. Benefield ◽  
Heath Luz McNaughton Reyes ◽  
Meridith Eastman ◽  
Alana M. Vivolo-Kantor ◽  
...  
2011 ◽  
Vol 26 (5) ◽  
pp. 669-683 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bina Ali ◽  
Monica Swahn ◽  
Merle Hamburger

This study examines the associations between attitudes supporting physical dating violence against boys hitting girls and girls hitting boys and experiences with physical dating violence perpetration and victimization among youth in a high-risk community. Cross-sectional logistic regression analyses are based on data from the Youth Violence Survey, conducted in 2004, and administered to more than 80% of public school students in grades 7, 9, 11, and 12 (N= 4,131) in an urban school district. Findings show that attitudes supporting physical dating violence against boys and girls are significantly associated with physical dating violence perpetration and victimization. Prevention programs that seek to reduce physical dating violence among adolescents may benefit from including sex-specific attitude modification as part of a comprehensive violence prevention approach.


2019 ◽  
Vol 34 (4) ◽  
pp. 661-677
Author(s):  
Brian Ermon Tussey ◽  
Kimberly A. Tyler

Though physical dating violence is prevalent among college students, the literature remains disjointed due to the number of studies that are a theoretical. As such, we examine physical dating violence perpetration and victimization informed by three theories: the background-situational model of dating violence, social learning theory, and attachment theory. Results revealed that gender, child abuse, styles of attachment, and risky behaviors were associated with both perpetrating and being a victim of physical dating violence. Protective factors, including maternal relationship quality and religiosity, were associated with a lower risk of perpetrating dating violence. Analyses demonstrate that some elements of all three theoretical perspectives were associated with dating violence perpetration and victimization. Implications of the study findings on practice and future research are discussed.


2014 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 317-331 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tara N. Richards ◽  
Kathryn A. Branch ◽  
Katherine Ray

Little is known about the role social support may play in reducing the risk of adolescent dating violence perpetration and victimization. This study is a longitudinal analysis of the independent impact of social support from friends and parents on the risk of emotional and physical dating violence perpetration and victimization among a large sample of female youth (n = 346). Findings indicate that 22% of the sample indicated perpetrating physical dating violence against a partner, whereas almost 16% revealed being the victim of physical dating violence; 34% of the sample indicated perpetrating emotional dating violence against a partner, whereas almost 39% revealed being the victim of emotional dating violence. Negative binomial regression models indicated that increased levels of support from friends at Time 1 was associated with significantly less physical and emotional dating violence perpetration and emotional (but not physical) dating violence victimization at Time 2. Parental support was not significantly related to dating violence in any model. Implications for dating violence curriculum and future research are addressed.


2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (2) ◽  
pp. 250-267 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meagan J. Brem ◽  
Caitlin Wolford-Clevenger ◽  
Heather Zapor ◽  
Joanna Elmquist ◽  
Ryan C. Shorey ◽  
...  

Mindfulness gained increased attention as it relates to aggressive behavior, including dating violence. However, no known studies examined how the combined influences of dispositional mindfulness and perceived partner infidelity, a well-documented correlate of dating violence, relate to women’s dating violence perpetration. Using a sample of college women ( N = 203), we examined the relationship between perceived partner infidelity and physical dating violence perpetration at varying levels of dispositional mindfulness, controlling for the influence of alcohol use. Results indicated perceived partner infidelity and dating violence perpetration were positively related for women with low and mean dispositional mindfulness, but not for women with high dispositional mindfulness. These results further support the applicability of mindfulness theory in the context of dating violence. Implications of the present findings provide preliminary support for mindfulness intervention in relationships characterized by infidelity concerns.


2011 ◽  
Vol 88 (2) ◽  
pp. 201-213 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emily F. Rothman ◽  
Renee M. Johnson ◽  
Robin Young ◽  
Janice Weinberg ◽  
Deborah Azrael ◽  
...  

2002 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 403-428 ◽  
Author(s):  
Candice M. Monson ◽  
Jennifer Langhinrichsen-Rohling

The present study tested the validity of an integrated sexual and nonsexual violence perpetrator typology outlined by Monson and Langhinrichsen-Rohling (1998) in a sample of 670 dating individuals. Two-hundred-and-sixty-five of the participants (87 men, 178 women) reported some act of sexual and/or physical dating violence perpetration in their lifetime. The data supported at least three perpetrator types, namely, the Relationship-only, Generally Violent/Antisocial, and Histrionic/Preoccupied types. Overall, these findings indicate that different factors may cause or maintain the intimate violence perpetrated within this heterogeneous population. There were important gender differences in perpetrator type membership, highlighting the differences in men’s and women’s use of violence. The implications of these findings are discussed with regard to the development of typologies, their application to men and women perpetrators, as well as their utility for the assessment and treatment of perpetrators.


Author(s):  
Terrinieka W. Powell ◽  
Amanda Latimore ◽  
Leslie Vanessa Martinez Fuentes ◽  
Beth D. Marshall ◽  
Tamar Mendelson ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document