scholarly journals Appendix 2: Global Food Safety Resources

2010 ◽  
pp. 311-313
Keyword(s):  
Food Safety ◽  
Global Food

Global food safety: determinants are Codex standards and WTO's SPS food safety regulations

2014 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 176-191 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rajneesh Mahajan ◽  
Suresh Garg ◽  
P.B. Sharma
Keyword(s):  
Food Safety ◽  
Research Work ◽  
The Body ◽  
Successful Implementation ◽  
Processed Food ◽  
Food Sector ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Safety Regulations ◽  
Food Safety Regulations ◽  
Global Food

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to investigate perspective in explaining how global food safety can be created through stringent implementation of Codex and World Trade Organization (WTOs) Sanitary and Phytosanitary food safety regulations and suggests the appropriate food safety system for India. Design/methodology/approach – The study has been deployed a survey questionnaire using a sample of Indian Processed food sector. In order to collect data 1,000 supply chain professional were contacted for seeking their consent to be part of the survey. Whereas total responses collected were 252 from Delhi and NCR, with response rate 25.2 percent. The data collected was empirical tested using descriptive statistics, correlation analysis, regression and ANOVA. Findings – The results and discussions indicate that all the global food safety norms laid down by WTO such as goods manufacturing practices, good hygienic practice, hazard analysis critical control point, has been developed to embody principles of safe food processing sector globally. India has also developed their food safety norms as per laid down principles by WTO. Originality/value – The present research work makes an important contribution to the body of literature on global food safety. The paper has important implications for the processed food sector since it tries to bring out practices which would help in successful implementation of global food safety standards. It is useful for academic food research as well as for processed food corporate.

IFS und GFSI zoffen um Zertifikate

2021 ◽  
Vol 73 (35) ◽  
pp. 22-22
Author(s):  
Hanno Bender
Keyword(s):  
Food Safety ◽  
Global Food Safety Initiative ◽  
Safety Initiative ◽  
Global Food

Im Markt für die Auditierung und Zertifizierung von Lebensmittelsicherheit will die Global Food Safety Initiative neue Services aufbauen. Die Standardorganisation IFS Management fürchtet das Entstehen eines Monopols und schaltet das Kartellamt ein. Doch die Wettbewerbshüter winken ab.

Testing with Confidence in the Pursuit of Global Food Safety

2012 ◽  
pp. 275-291
Author(s):  
Ronald L. Johnson ◽  
Robert E. Koeritzer
Keyword(s):  
Food Safety ◽  
Global Food

Companies' Opinions and Acceptance of Global Food Safety Initiative Benchmarks after Implementation

2012 ◽  
Vol 75 (9) ◽  
pp. 1660-1672 ◽  
Author(s):  
PHIL CRANDALL ◽  
ELLEN J. VAN LOO ◽  
CORLISS A. O'BRYAN ◽  
ANDY MAUROMOUSTAKOS ◽  
FRANK YIANNAS ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Food Safety ◽  
Online Survey ◽  
Safety Management ◽  
Food Prices ◽  
Common Reason ◽  
Quality Food ◽  
Global Food Safety Initiative ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Safety Initiative ◽  
Global Food

International attention has been focused on minimizing costs that may unnecessarily raise food prices. One important aspect to consider is the redundant and overlapping costs of food safety audits. The Global Food Safety Initiative (GFSI) has devised benchmarked schemes based on existing international food safety standards for use as a unifying standard accepted by many retailers. The present study was conducted to evaluate the impact of the decision made by Walmart Stores (Bentonville, AR) to require their suppliers to become GFSI compliant. An online survey of 174 retail suppliers was conducted to assess food suppliers' opinions of this requirement and the benefits suppliers realized when they transitioned from their previous food safety systems. The most common reason for becoming GFSI compliant was to meet customers' requirements; thus, supplier implementation of the GFSI standards was not entirely voluntary. Other reasons given for compliance were enhancing food safety and remaining competitive. About 54% of food processing plants using GFSI benchmarked schemes followed the guidelines of Safe Quality Food 2000 and 37% followed those of the British Retail Consortium. At the supplier level, 58% followed Safe Quality Food 2000 and 31% followed the British Retail Consortium. Respondents reported that the certification process took about 10 months. The most common reason for selecting a certain GFSI benchmarked scheme was because it was widely accepted by customers (retailers). Four other common reasons were (i) the standard has a good reputation in the industry, (ii) the standard was recommended by others, (iii) the standard is most often used in the industry, and (iv) the standard was required by one of their customers. Most suppliers agreed that increased safety of their products was required to comply with GFSI benchmarked schemes. They also agreed that the GFSI required a more carefully documented food safety management system, which often required improved company food safety practices and increased employee training. Adoption of a GFSI benchmarked scheme resulted in fewer audits, i.e., one less per year. An educational opportunity exists to acquaint retailers and suppliers worldwide with the benefits of having an internationally recognized certification program such as that recognized by the GFSI.

scholarly journals Natural bioactive substances for the control of food-borne viruses and contaminants in food

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yao Pan ◽  
Zeyuan Deng ◽  
Fereidoon Shahidi
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Food Safety ◽  
Health Hazard ◽  
Bioactive Substances ◽  
Food Protection ◽  
Food Borne ◽  
Prevention And Treatment ◽  
The Common ◽  
Preventive Effects ◽  
Global Food

Abstract Food-borne viruses and contaminants, as an important global food safety problem, are caused by chemical, microbiological, zoonotic, and other risk factors that represent a health hazard. Natural bioactive substances, originating from plants, animals, or microorganisms, might offer the possibility of preventing and controlling food-borne diseases. In this contribution, the common bioactive substances such as polyphenols, essential oils, proteins, and polysaccharides which are effective in the prevention and treatment of food-borne viruses and contaminants are discussed. Meanwhile, the preventive effects of natural bioactive substances and the possible mechanisms involved in food protection are discussed and detailed. The application and potential effects of natural bioactive substances in the adjuvant treatment for food-borne diseases is also described. Graphical abstract

scholarly journals Global Food Safety—International Consumers’ Rights?

Foods ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 460-461
Author(s):  
Malik Hussain
Keyword(s):  
Food Safety ◽  
Global Food
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document