The Development of Social Problem-Solving Interventions in Young Offender Mental Health Services: A Focus Upon Self-Harm and Suicide Risk

2008 ◽  
pp. 145-162 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fiona H. Biggam ◽  
Kevin G. Power
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Problem Solving ◽  
Mental Health Services ◽  
Health Services ◽  
Social Problem ◽  
Suicide Risk ◽  
Social Problem Solving ◽  
Young Offender ◽  
Self Harm

scholarly journals Structured Professional Judgment to Assist the Evaluation and Safety Planning of Suicide Risk: The Risk of Suicide Protocol (RoSP)

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicola S. Gray ◽  
Ann John ◽  
Aimee McKinnon ◽  
Stephanie Raybould ◽  
James Knowles ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Mental Health Services ◽  
Health Services ◽  
Clinical Evaluation ◽  
Suicide Risk ◽  
Professional Judgment ◽  
Health Board ◽  
Safety Planning ◽  
Nice Guidelines ◽  
Structured Professional Judgment

Background: The Risk of Suicide Protocol (RoSP) is a structured professional judgment (SPJ) scheme designed in line with NICE guidelines to improve clinicians' ability to evaluate and manage suicide risk.Aims: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of RoSP in two settings: (1) unexpected deaths of people in the community who were known to mental health services; and (2) an inpatient hospital specializing in the assessment and treatment of patients with personality disorder.Method: In Study 1, information from a database of unexpected deaths (N = 68) within an NHS health board was used to complete a RoSP assessment (blind to cause of death) and information from the Coroner's Court was used to assign people to suicide vs. natural causes/accidental death. In Study 2, patients (N = 62) were assessed on the RoSP upon admission to hospital and their self-injurious behaviors were recorded over the first 3 months of admission.Results: (1) Evaluations using RoSP were highly reliable in both samples (ICCs 0.93–0.98); (2) professional judgment based on the RoSP was predictive of completed suicide in the community sample (AUC = 0.83) and; (3) was predictive of both suicide attempts (AUC = 0.81) and all self-injurious behaviors (AUC = 0.80) for the inpatient sample.Conclusion: RoSP is a reliable and valid instrument for the structured clinical evaluation of suicide risk for use in inpatient psychiatric services and in community mental health services. RoSP's efficacy is comparable to well-established structured professional judgment instruments designed to predict other risk behavior (e.g., HCR-20 and the prediction of violence). The use of RoSP for the clinical evaluation of suicide risk and safety-planning provides a structure for meeting NICE guidelines for suicide prevention and is now evidence-based.

Social Problem Solving as a Predictor of Attitudes Toward Seeking Mental Health Care and Medical Care Among Veterans

2014 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 304-315 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrea G. Segal ◽  
Christopher E. Diaz ◽  
Christine Maguth Nezu ◽  
Arthur M. Nezu
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Problem Solving ◽  
Mental Health Care ◽  
Medical Care ◽  
Social Problem ◽  
Social Problem Solving

scholarly journals Referral pathways between the mental health services and Jigsaw

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (3) ◽  
pp. 195-199
Author(s):  
E. Beatty ◽  
R. Keogh ◽  
D. Cohen ◽  
G. McDonald ◽  
C. McDonald ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Mental Health Services ◽  
Health Services ◽  
Chart Review ◽  
Retrospective Chart Review ◽  
Mental Health Difficulties ◽  
Self Harm ◽  
Clinical Profiles ◽  
Similarities And Differences

ObjectivesTo examine similarities and differences in the demographic and clinical profiles of young people (15–25 years of age) referred between the mental health services (MHS) and Jigsaw Galway.MethodsA retrospective chart review was conducted of clinical files of individuals attending secondary MHS who had been referred to or from Jigsaw Galway over a 5-year period. Differences in demographic and clinical data between individuals referred to or from Jigsaw Galway were compared.ResultsA recent act of self-harm was more prevalent in individuals referred from Jigsaw to the adult MHS (p=0.02). No other demographic or clinical differences were detected between individuals attending Jigsaw Galway and the MHS.ConclusionsEducation sessions for clinical staff working in primary care, Jigsaw Galway and the MHS are suggested to support clinicians in choosing the best referral pathway, which may more optimally address young people’s mental health difficulties.

scholarly journals Primary care clinical management following self-harm during the first wave of COVID-19 in the UK

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Steeg ◽  
Matthew J Carr ◽  
Laszlo Trefan ◽  
Darren M Ashcroft ◽  
Nav Kapur ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Mental Health Services ◽  
Health Services ◽  
Psychotropic Medication ◽  
Clinical Management ◽  
Practice Nurse ◽  
Self Harm ◽  
The Uk ◽  
The Impact

AbstractBackgroundA substantial reduction in GP-recorded self-harm occurred during the first wave of COVID-19 but effects on primary care management of self-harm are unknown.AimTo examine the impact of COVID-19 on clinical management within three months of an episode of self-harm.Design and settingProspective cohort study using data from the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink.MethodWe compared cohorts of patients with an index self-harm episode recorded during a pre-pandemic period (10th March-10th June, 2010-2019) versus the COVID-19 first-wave period (10th March-10th June 2020). Patients were followed up for three months to capture psychotropic medication prescribing, GP/practice nurse consultation and referral to mental health services.Results48,739 episodes of self-harm were recorded during the pre-pandemic period and 4,238 during the first-wave COVID-19 period. Similar proportions were prescribed psychotropic medication within 3 months in the pre-pandemic (54.0%) and COVID-19 first-wave (54.9%) cohorts. Likelihood of having at least one GP/practice nurse consultation was broadly similar (83.2% vs. 80.3% in the COVID-19 cohort). The proportion of patients referred to mental health services in the COVID-19 cohort (3.4%) was around half of that in the pre-pandemic cohort (6.5%).ConclusionDespite the challenges experienced by primary healthcare teams during the initial COVID-19 wave, prescribing and consultation patterns following self-harm were broadly similar to pre-pandemic levels. However, the reduced likelihood of referral to mental health services warrants attention. Accessible outpatient and community services for people who have self-harmed are required as the COVID-19 crisis recedes and the population faces new challenges to mental health.

611 Screening Adults for Depression and Suicidality in an Outpatient Burn Center

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S149-S150
Author(s):  
Amanda Rose ◽  
Alan D Gilbertson ◽  
Heather Belacic ◽  
John Crow
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Suicidal Ideation ◽  
Mental Health Services ◽  
Health Services ◽  
Suicide Risk ◽  
Compliance Rate ◽  
Quality Improvement Initiative ◽  
Burn Patients ◽  
Initial Visit ◽  
Burn Center

Abstract Introduction In response to NIH recommendations and ABA verification standards, a protocol was initiated to screen adult burn patients in an outpatient verified burn center for depression and suicidality. It utilized the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), a widely recognized depression screening tool. The protocol dictated patients scoring 10 or greater, or endorsing the suicide risk question would require further assessment. This project was part of a quality improvement initiative to assess initiating the protocol, identifying at-risk patients, and making appropriate referrals. Methods The initial visit of adults (ages 19 and over) seen over a one year period were retrospectively reviewed. For adults screening positive in the EMR, a Data Collection Form was completed gathering information on PHQ-9 scores, mental health treatment and diagnosis, and burn injuries. Results There were 748 adults seen for an initial visit at the burn center, ages 19–85, 61% men and 39% women. Of those patients, 572 had a PHQ-9 score documented in the EMR, demonstrating a 76% compliance rate with administration. Of those screened, 52 met criteria for inclusion by scoring 10 or greater or endorsing the suicide risk question on the PHQ-9. Scoring ranges on the PHQ-9 were as follows (N=52): 15.4% mild; 50% moderate; 19.2% moderate-severe; and 15.4% severe. Sixty percent of patients endorsed some suicidal ideation. Fifty two percent of patients were documented clearly as being on psychotropic medication or in specialized mental health services. Results were reviewed or discussed with patients in 81% of the initial visit notes. Nineteen of the 52 patients were offered a referral for mental health services. Conclusions Initiating this protocol creates an opportunity to begin conversations about mental health and offer additional support to patients. Approximately 9% of the outpatients screened at the burn center endorsed significant symptoms of depression and or suicidal ideation. Nearly half of these patients were not actively receiving treatment for these symptoms and could potentially benefit from mental health services. This project highlighted that compliance with administering and documenting the PHQ-9 and referral for follow-up services could be improved at this institution. Applicability of Research to Practice This protocol supports the need for continued evaluation and screening for depression and suicide risk in adult burn patients. Consideration should be given for monitoring other mental health conditions that could create barriers to care or compliance with treatment, such as anxiety, PTSD, psychosis, etc.

The management of young people who self-harm by New Zealand Infant, Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services: cutting-edge or cutting corners?

2018 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 152-159
Author(s):  
Hiran Thabrew ◽  
Ernest Gandeza ◽  
Giselle Bahr ◽  
David Bettany ◽  
Chris Bampton ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
New Zealand ◽  
Mental Health Services ◽  
Young People ◽  
Health Services ◽  
Adolescent Mental Health ◽  
Child And Adolescent ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Behaviour Therapy ◽  
Self Harm

Objectives: Self-harm is common in New Zealand (NZ) young people and can have short-term and long-term consequences, including suicide. This study was undertaken to examine the extent to which evidence-based approaches for addressing self-harm are offered by Infant, Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services (ICAMHS). Methods: A national survey of ICAMHS practitioners working with young people who self-harm was undertaken between May and July 2016. Results: Responses from 23 out of 30 ICAMHS confirmed self-harm was a familiar presentation and most commonly associated with diagnoses of depression, anxiety and borderline personality disorder. Cognitive behavioural therapy (47.1%, n = 8), dialectical behaviour therapy (47.1%, n = 8) and acceptance and commitment therapy (5.9%, n = 1) were the treatments of choice, but variably delivered. There were significant training gaps for all types of therapy. Conclusions: Although it is reassuring that many ICAMHS are using evidence-based approaches to address self-harm in young people, there is concerning variability in the way these therapies are delivered. Improvement in training in key modalities, further research into therapist performance and continuous evaluation of workforce development are needed to maximise the effectiveness of proven interventions and provide NZ young people with the state-of-the-art service they deserve.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document