scholarly journals Appendix II: Tables of Transport Cross Sections for Model Potentials

2005 ◽  
pp. 499-529
Keyword(s):  
Cross Sections ◽  
Model Potentials

High energy photoionization of bound systems

2020 ◽  
Vol 35 (03) ◽  
pp. 2040021
Author(s):  
E. G. Drukarev ◽  
A. I. Mikhailov
Keyword(s):  
Cross Sections ◽  
Bound States ◽  
Wave Equations ◽  
High Energy ◽  
Central Field ◽  
Model Potentials

We demonstrate how the nonrelativistic high energy asymptotics for the photoionization cross sections of systems bound by a central field can be obtained without solving the wave equations. The earlier analysis carried out for s bound states is extended for p states. We show that the physically expected asymptotics for ionization of fullerenes is not reproduced by the model potentials employed nowadays.

Low-energy positron–hydrogen molecule scattering

1982 ◽  
Vol 60 (4) ◽  
pp. 597-600 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sukanya Sur ◽  
A. S. Ghosh
Keyword(s):  
Cross Sections ◽  
Effective Potential ◽  
Qualitative Agreement ◽  
Hydrogen Molecule ◽  
Low Energy ◽  
Total Cross Sections ◽  
Model Potentials ◽  
Theoretical Predictions ◽  
Molecule Scattering

The method of Hara using two centre formalism has been employed to investigate positron–hydrogen molecule scattering at low incident energies. Two model potentials have been used to see the importance of the choice of effective potential. It has been found that the total cross sections are sensitive to the details of the effective potential. The present results are in qualitative agreement with measured values and other existing theoretical predictions.

Global phenomenological optical model potentials for 8,10,11B projectiles

2018 ◽  
Vol 27 (11) ◽  
pp. 1850099 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yong-Li Xu ◽  
Hai-Rui Guo ◽  
Yin-Lu Han ◽  
Qing-Biao Shen
Keyword(s):  
Experimental Data ◽  
Elastic Scattering ◽  
Cross Sections ◽  
Optical Model ◽  
Model Potential ◽  
Reaction Cross ◽  
Angular Distributions ◽  
Model Potentials ◽  
Optical Model Potential ◽  
Reaction Cross Sections

Based on the obtained [Formula: see text] global optical model potential, the global phenomenological optical model potential for [Formula: see text] projectile is obtained by fitting the experimental data of [Formula: see text] elastic scattering angular distributions from [Formula: see text] to [Formula: see text] targets with incident energies below 100[Formula: see text]MeV. Using the found global optical model potential, the reaction cross-sections are predicted and compared with the available experimental data. Moreover, the elastic-scattering angular distributions and reaction cross-sections for isotopic chain [Formula: see text] projectiles are predicted by the [Formula: see text] global optical model potential at different incident energies. These results are also compared with the corresponding experimental data. The performance shows that the [Formula: see text] global phenomenological optical model potentials can give a satisfactory description for elastic scattering of these projectiles.

Analysis of STEM micrographs of thick objects

1978 ◽  
Vol 36 (2) ◽  
pp. 106-107
Author(s):  
S. Golladay
Keyword(s):  
Inelastic Scattering ◽  
Multiple Scattering ◽  
Mass Distribution ◽  
Cross Sections ◽  
Phase Contrast ◽  
Image Point ◽  
Contrast Effects ◽  
Total Cross Sections ◽  
Elastic And Inelastic Scattering

The theory of multiple scattering has been worked out by Groves and comparisons have been made between predicted and observed signals for thick specimens observed in a STEM under conditions where phase contrast effects are unimportant. Independent measurements of the collection efficiencies of the two STEM detectors, calculations of the ratio σe/σi = R, where σe, σi are the total cross sections for elastic and inelastic scattering respectively, and a model of the unknown mass distribution are needed for these comparisons. In this paper an extension of this work will be described which allows the determination of the required efficiencies, R, and the unknown mass distribution from the data without additional measurements or models. Essential to the analysis is the fact that in a STEM two or more signal measurements can be made simultaneously at each image point.

Direct Observation of Heat Exchanger Deposits by Cross Sectioning

1967 ◽  
Vol 25 ◽  
pp. 364-365
Author(s):  
R. W. Anderson ◽  
D. L. Senecal
Keyword(s):  
Electron Microscopy ◽  
Transmission Electron Microscopy ◽  
Heat Exchanger ◽  
Direct Observation ◽  
Cross Sections ◽  
Preparation Method ◽  
Specimen Preparation ◽  
Flowing Water ◽  
Transmission Electron ◽  
Deposit Layer

A problem was presented to observe the packing densities of deposits of sub-micron corrosion product particles. The deposits were 5-100 mils thick and had formed on the inside surfaces of 3/8 inch diameter Zircaloy-2 heat exchanger tubes. The particles were iron oxides deposited from flowing water and consequently were only weakly bonded. Particular care was required during handling to preserve the original formations of the deposits. The specimen preparation method described below allowed direct observation of cross sections of the deposit layers by transmission electron microscopy.The specimens were short sections of the tubes (about 3 inches long) that were carefully cut from the systems. The insides of the tube sections were first coated with a thin layer of a fluid epoxy resin by dipping. This coating served to impregnate the deposit layer as well as to protect the layer if subsequent handling were required.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document