scholarly journals A New Tool to Account for Crater Obliteration Effects in Crater Size-Frequency Distribution Measurements

2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (6) ◽  
pp. 258-267 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Riedel ◽  
Gregory Michael ◽  
Thomas Kneissl ◽  
Csilla Orgel ◽  
Harald Hiesinger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Frequency Distribution ◽  
Size Frequency Distribution ◽  
Crater Size ◽  
Size Frequency

scholarly journals 2.2.2 The Size Frequency Distribution and Rate of Production of Microcraters

1976 ◽  
Vol 31 ◽  
pp. 227-231
Author(s):  
D. A. Morrison ◽  
E. Zinner
Keyword(s):  
Frequency Distribution ◽  
Lunar Surface ◽  
Particle Flux ◽  
Surface Orientation ◽  
Submicron Particle ◽  
Size Frequency Distribution ◽  
Frequency Distributions ◽  
Crater Size ◽  
Size Frequency ◽  
Micron Diameter

AbstractCrater size frequency distributions vary to a degree which probably cannot be explained by variations in lunar surface orientation of the crater detectors or changes in micrometeoroid flux. Questions of sample representativity suggest that high ratios of small to large craters of micrometeoroids (e.g., a million 1.0 micron craters for each 500 micron crater) should be the most reliable. We obtain a flux for particles producing 0.1 micron diameter craters of approximately 300 per cm2 per steradian per year. We observe no anisotropy in the submicron particle flux between the plane of the ecliptic and the normal in the direction of lunar north. No change in flux over a 106 year period is indicated by our data.

scholarly journals Maria Basalts Chronology of the Chang’E-5 Sampling Site

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (8) ◽  
pp. 1515
Author(s):  
Zhen Xu ◽  
Dijun Guo ◽  
Jianzhong Liu
Keyword(s):  
Frequency Distribution ◽  
Thermal Evolution ◽  
Sampling Site ◽  
Landing Site ◽  
Age Dating ◽  
Size Frequency Distribution ◽  
Crater Size ◽  
Size Frequency ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
The Absolute

Chang’E-5 is the first lunar sample return mission of China. The spacecraft was landed in the northwest of the Procellarum KREEP Terrane (43.0576°N, 308.0839°E) on 1 December 2020 and returned 1731 g samples from a previously unvisited region. The landing area has been proposed as one of the youngest mare basalt units of the Moon and holds important information of lunar thermal evolution and chronology. However, the absolute model ages estimated in previous studies are quite different, ranging from 2.07 Ga to 1.21 Ga. Such significant difference may be caused by (1) different crater counting areas, (2) different crater diameter ranges, (3) effects of secondary craters, and (4) biases in crater identification. Moreover, the accurate landing site was unknown and the ages were estimated over the Eratosthenian-aged mare unit (Em4) instead. In light of the above unsatisfactory conditions, this study seeks to establish a standard crater size-frequency distribution of the CE-5 landing site. We derived the concentrations of FeO and TiO2 to map out the pure basaltic areas where external ejecta deposits are negligible and thus secondary craters are rare. Based on the geochemistry of basaltic ejecta excavated by fresh craters in the mare unit, the FeO concentration threshold for mapping pure basaltic areas is 17.2 wt.%. The morphologically flat subunits in the pure basaltic areas were selected for crater identification and age dating to exclude the contamination of external ejecta to the best as we could. In the Chang’E-5 sampling site subunit, we detected 313 craters with a diameter greater than 100 m and derived the absolute model age as 1.49−0.084+0.084 Ga. The craters identified in all pure basaltic subunits of Em4 gave the model age of 1.41−0.028+0.027 Ga. As least affected by secondary craters, the crater size-frequency distribution of the sample-collected pure basaltic subunit can provide important constraints for lunar cratering chronology function in combination with isotopic age of returned samples.

Crater size-frequency distribution measurements and age of the Compton–Belkovich Volcanic Complex

Icarus ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 273 ◽  
pp. 214-223 ◽  
Author(s):  
K.A. Shirley ◽  
M. Zanetti ◽  
B. Jolliff ◽  
C.H. van der Bogert ◽  
H. Hiesinger
Keyword(s):  
Frequency Distribution ◽  
Volcanic Complex ◽  
Size Frequency Distribution ◽  
Crater Size ◽  
Size Frequency
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document