Limits of heat as a tracer to quantify transient lateral river-aquifer exchanges

2017 ◽  
Vol 53 (9) ◽  
pp. 7740-7755 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yueqing Xie ◽  
Jordi Batlle-Aguilar
Keyword(s):  
2018 ◽  
Vol 246 ◽  
pp. 01098
Author(s):  
Guangdong Wu ◽  
Xiao Zhang ◽  
Jijun Xu

The streambed flux is variable in space; the spatial variability results in part from bedforms, but few works on streambed fluxes in channels with strongly abrupt varying bedforms are carried out. Heat as a tracer to delineate the streambed flux pattern has been widely adopted in numerous fields. In this paper, a braided channel with complicated topography was selected as study site, where the temperature was monitored. One-dimensional (1-D) analytical method based on the amplitude attenuation (Ar) and 1-D numerical method were used to interpret the temperature. As a result, streambed fluxes of a total of 50 sites in the braided channel are obtained. From the results we can know the magnitude and direction of streamed flow velocity are spatially variable, even within a 1-m distance. Then, this study summarizes five bedform-driven flux patterns: ① downward flow driven by the head difference between groundwater and stream, ② downward flow related to a meter-scale pool, ③ a transition from upward to downward flow associated with a centimeter-scale riffle, ④ horizontal flow in braided bars and ⑤ upward flow driven by vegetation roots. Overall, multiple physical mechanisms together contributed to the complex streambed flow system, which reflected great challenges for the scaling up of point-in-space seepage flux.


2016 ◽  
Vol 52 (7) ◽  
pp. 5442-5457 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria V. Klepikova ◽  
Tanguy Le Borgne ◽  
Olivier Bour ◽  
Marco Dentz ◽  
Rebecca Hochreutener ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 383-395 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlos Duque ◽  
Sascha Müller ◽  
Eva Sebok ◽  
Kinza Haider ◽  
Peter Engesgaard

2016 ◽  
Vol 159 ◽  
pp. 358-373 ◽  
Author(s):  
Landon J.S. Halloran ◽  
Gabriel C. Rau ◽  
Martin S. Andersen
Keyword(s):  

Ground Water ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 53 (S1) ◽  
pp. 139-148 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kennedy O. Doro ◽  
Olaf A. Cirpka ◽  
Carsten Leven

2013 ◽  
Vol 49 (6) ◽  
pp. 3697-3711 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ramon C. Naranjo ◽  
Greg Pohll ◽  
Richard G. Niswonger ◽  
Mark Stone ◽  
Alan Mckay

2012 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 4305-4332 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Shanafield ◽  
C. L. Shope ◽  
W. A. McKay

Abstract. Although many studies examine the use of heat as a tracer to determine vertical infiltration of water into the streambed, few consider the case where both water and heat flow (advection and conduction) are in the upwards direction. In this study, we compare the usefulness of both a one-dimensional numerical model and two analytical solutions for the case where water movement is upwards and the (flat) groundwater temperature is greater than the diel temperatures at the surface. We first create a theoretical test case to compare expected temperature traces at various depths within the sediment column for each model both in the presence and absence of a vertical temperature gradient. These theoretical results are discussed in light of the assumptions inherent in the models. Then the models are applied to a study area located along a reach of the Truckee River in Nevada, USA, during the winter season and flux estimates both between models and between sensor depths are compared. Our results show that despite violation of some assumptions inherent in the analytical models, flux estimates over the entire vertical streambed column can be within one order of magnitude of the numerical model under some conditions. Further, predictions of downwards flux obtained using only the shallow sensors highlight the need to consider the physical processes to be measured when choosing sensor depth, especially when advection and conduction are upwards.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document