scholarly journals Linking Late Cretaceous to Eocene Tectonostratigraphy of the San Jacinto Fold Belt of NW Colombia With Caribbean Plateau Collision and Flat Subduction

Tectonics ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 36 (11) ◽  
pp. 2599-2629 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Alejandro Mora ◽  
Onno Oncken ◽  
Eline Le Breton ◽  
Mauricio Ibánez-Mejia ◽  
Claudio Faccenna ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Late Cretaceous ◽  
Fold Belt

GEOLOGIC EVOLUTION AND HYDROCARBON HABITAT GIPPSLAND BASIN

1972 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 132 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Barry Hocking
Keyword(s):  
Late Cretaceous ◽  
Upper Cretaceous ◽  
Meteoric Water ◽  
Oil And Gas ◽  
Basin Evolution ◽  
Fold Belt ◽  
Apparent Lack ◽  
Northern Flank ◽  
Southeastern Australia ◽  
Gippsland Basin

The Gippsland Basin of southeastern Australia is a post-orogenic, continental margin type of basin of Upper Cretaceous-Cainozoic age.Gippsland Basin evolution can be traced back to the establishment of the Strzelecki Basin, or ancestral Gippsland Basin, during the Jurassic. Gippsland Basin sedimentation commenced in the middle to late Cretaceous and is represented as a gross transgressive-regressive cycle consisting of the continental Latrobe Valley Group (Upper Cretaceous to Eocene or Miocene), the marine Seaspray Group (Oligocene to Pliocene or Recent), and finally the continental Sale Group (Pliocene to Recent).The hydrocarbons of the Gippsland Shelf petroleum province were generated within the Latrobe Valley Group and are trapped in porous fluvio-deltaic sandstones of the Latrobe. At Lakes Entrance, however, oil and gas are present in a marginal sandy facies of the Lakes Entrance Formation (Seaspray Group).The buried Strzelecki Basin has played a fundamental role in the development and distribution of the Cainozoic fold belt in the northern Gippsland Basin. The Gippsland Shelf hydrocarbon accumulations fall within this belt and are primarily structural traps. The apparent lack of structural accumulations onshore in Gippsland is largely due to a Plio-Pleistocene episode of cratonic uplift that was accompanied by basinward tilting of structures and meteoric water influx.The non-commercial Lakes Entrance field, located on the stable northern flank of the basin, is a stratigraphic trap and may serve as a guide for future exploration.

Regional Jointing in Southern Alberta

1973 ◽  
Vol 10 (12) ◽  
pp. 1769-1781 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elkanah A. Babcock
Keyword(s):  
Late Cretaceous ◽  
Rocky Mountains ◽  
Sedimentary Rock ◽  
Rocky Mountain ◽  
Complex Pattern ◽  
Basic Unit ◽  
Fold Belt ◽  
Appalachian Plateau ◽  
Southern Alberta ◽  
Orthogonal Systems

Regional joints in southern Alberta form patterns that persist over an area extending from the Rocky Mountain Foothills to the Saskatchewan border. These patterns persist vertically through a section of rocks ranging in age from Late Cretaceous to Late Paleocene.The basic unit of jointing is an orthogonal system consisting of two sets of extension fractures. Two or more orthogonal systems may be present at a given locality creating a complex pattern of joints. System I predominates and has sets trending approximately 65 °and 155°, or roughly normal and parallel to the Rocky Mountains. System II joints trend approximately 5 °and 95°, but swing about 15 °clockwise in the Drumheller area. A system having sets trending 45 °and 135 °is present near Medicine Hat.System I joints roughly parallel intermediate width (32-64 km) subsurface structural undulations described by Robinson et al. (1969). System II joints trend parallel and normal to the crest of the Sweet-grass Arch. Further study is needed to determine the age and origin of jointing.Regional joints in southern Alberta show similarities with regional joints in similar structural settings on the Appalachian Plateau and on the Central Oklahoma Plains. Within these areas orthogonal systems of regional joints trend normal and parallel to the adjacent fold belt over vast areas and through great thicknesses of sedimentary rock.

scholarly journals Late Cretaceous topographic doming caused by initial upwelling of Deccan magmas: Stratigraphic and sedimentological evidence

2019 ◽  
Vol 132 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 835-849 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juan Li ◽  
Xiumian Hu ◽  
Eduardo Garzanti ◽  
Santanu Banerjee ◽  
Marcelle BouDagher-Fadel
Keyword(s):  
Late Cretaceous ◽  
Sediment Accumulation ◽  
Fold Belt ◽  
Deccan Volcanism ◽  
Peninsular India ◽  
The Core ◽  
Surface Uplift ◽  
Fold And Thrust Belt ◽  
Peripheral Areas ◽  
Climate Cooling

Abstract This study focused on uppermost Cretaceous sedimentary rocks deposited in the Himalayan region and around the core of peninsular India just before the eruption of the Deccan Traps. Detailed stratigraphic and sedimentological analysis of Late Cretaceous successions in the Himalayan Range together with literature data from the Kirthar fold-and-thrust belt and central to southeastern India document a marked shallowing-upward depositional trend that took place in the Campanian–Maastrichtian before the Deccan magmatic outburst around the Cretaceous-Tertiary boundary. Topographic uplift of the Indian peninsula began in Campanian time and is held responsible for thick sediment accumulation associated with shorter periods of nondeposition in peripheral areas (Himalayan Range, Kirthar fold belt, and Krishna-Godavari Basin) than in the central part of the Deccan Province. Surface uplift preceding Deccan volcanism took place at warm-humid equatorial latitudes, which may have led to an acceleration of silicate weathering, lowered atmospheric pCO2, and climate cooling starting in the Campanian–Maastrichtian. The radial centrifugal fluvial drainage in India that is still observed today was established at that time.

STRUCTURAL FRAMEWORK AND BASIN EVOLUTION OF AUSTRALIA’S SOUTHERN MARGIN

2003 ◽  
Vol 43 (1) ◽  
pp. 13 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.P. Teasdale ◽  
L.L. Pryer ◽  
P.G. Stuart-Smith ◽  
K.K. Romine ◽  
M.A. Etheridge ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Late Cretaceous ◽  
Structural Control ◽  
Structural Evolution ◽  
Shear Zones ◽  
Basin Evolution ◽  
Primary Control ◽  
Fold Belt ◽  
Southern Margin ◽  
Lachlan Fold Belt ◽  
Basement Structures

The structural evolution of all of the Southern Margin Basins can be explained by episodic reactivation of basement structures in respect to a specific sequence of tectonic events. Three geological provinces dominate the basement geology of the Southern Margin basins. The Eyre, Ceduna, Duntroon and Polda Basins overlie basement of the Archean to Proterozoic Gawler-Antarctic Craton. The Otway and Sorell Basins overlie basement of the Neoproterozoic-early Palaeozoic Adelaide- Kanmantoo Fold Belt. The Bass and Gippsland Basins overlie basement of the Palaeozoic Lachlan Fold Belt. The contrasting basement terranes within the three basement provinces and the structures within and between them significantly influenced the evolution and architecture of the Southern Margin basins.The present-day geometry was established during three Mesozoic extensional basin phases:Late Jurassic–Early Cretaceous NW–SE transtension forming deep rift basins to the west and linked pullapart basins and oblique graben east of the Southwest Ceduna Accommodation Zone; Early–Mid Cretaceous NE–SW extension; and Late Cretaceous NNE–SSW extension leading to continental breakup. At least three, potentially trap forming, inversion events have variably influenced the Southern Margin basins; Mid Cretaceous, Eocene, and Miocene-Recent. Volcanism occurred along the margin during the Late Cretaceous and sporadically through the Tertiary.First-order structural control on Mesozoic rifting and breakup were east–west trending basement structures of the southern Australian fracture zone. Second-order controls include:Proterozoic basement shear zones and/or terrane boundaries in the western Gawler Craton, which controlled basin evolution in the Eyre and Ceduna Subbasins; Neoproterozoic structures, which significantly influenced basin evolution in the Ceduna sub-basin; Cambro-Ordovician basement shear zones and/or terrane boundaries, which were a primary control on basin evolution in the Otway and Sorell Basins; and Palaeozoic structures in the Lachlan Fold Belt, which controlled basin evolution in the Bass and Gippsland Basins.A SEEBASE™ (Structurally Enhanced view of Economic Basement) model for the Southern Margin basins has been constructed to show basement topography. When used in combination with a rigorous interpretation of the structural evolution of the margin, it provides a foundation for basin phase and source rock distribution, hydrocarbon fluid focal points and trap type/distribution.

The effects of diagenesis on the reservoir characters in sandstones of the Late Cretaceous Pab Formation, Kirthar Fold Belt, southern Pakistan

2011 ◽  
Vol 40 (2) ◽  
pp. 622-635 ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad Umar ◽  
Henrik Friis ◽  
Abdul Salam Khan ◽  
Akhtar Muhammad Kassi ◽  
Aimal Khan Kasi
Keyword(s):  
Late Cretaceous ◽  
Fold Belt

scholarly journals The Kap Washington Group volcanics

1981 ◽  
Vol 106 ◽  
pp. 65-68
Author(s):  
P.E Brown ◽  
I Parsons
Keyword(s):  
Late Cretaceous ◽  
Volcanic Rocks ◽  
Personal Communication ◽  
North Coast ◽  
Sr Isotopes ◽  
Fold Belt ◽  
The North ◽  
Early Tertiary ◽  
North Greenland

The Kap Washington Group volcanic rocks outcrop on the north coast of Johannes V. Jensen Land and Lockwood ø, where they are in thrust contact with Palaeozoic metasediments of the North Greenland fold belt. Their outcrop is limited, from west to east, to Lockwood Ø, Kap Kane, Kap Washington and Kap Cannon (fig. 21). The vo1canic rocks post-date basic dykes which cut Carboniferous and Permian sediments (Håkansson et al., this report) and their age, as determined by whole rock Rb-Sr isotopes in rhyolitic material, is 63 Ma (Larsen et al., 1978) i.e. early Tertiary. This is somewhat younger than the late Cretaceous age established by micropalaeontological evidence (D. Batten, personal communication) from shales, found in 1980, interbedded with the voicanics.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document