Acceleration of radiation belt electrons and the role of the average interplanetary magnetic field B z component in high‐speed streams

2017 ◽  
Vol 122 (10) ◽  
pp. 10,084-10,101 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. M. Souza ◽  
R. E. Lopez ◽  
P. R. Jauer ◽  
D. G. Sibeck ◽  
K. Pham ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Field ◽  
Interplanetary Magnetic Field ◽  
High Speed ◽  
Radiation Belt ◽  
Radiation Belt Electrons

Comparison of polar ionospheric behavior at Arctic and Antarctic regions for improved satellite-based positioning

2021 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Arun Kumar Singh ◽  
Sampad Kumar Panda
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Field ◽  
Interplanetary Magnetic Field ◽  
Arctic Region ◽  
Auroral Oval ◽  
Ionospheric Scintillation ◽  
Electron Content ◽  
Total Electron ◽  
Polar Latitude ◽  
Tec Variability

Abstract In this paper, we investigate the hemispheric symmetric and asymmetric characteristics of ionospheric total electron content (TEC) and its dependency on the interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) in the northern and southern polar ionosphere. The changes in amplitude and phase scintillation are also probed through Global Ionospheric Scintillation and TEC monitoring (GISTM) systems recordings at North pole [Himadri station; Geographic 78°55′ N, 11°56′ E] and South pole [Maitri station; Geographic 70°46′ S 11°44′ E]. Observations show the range of %TEC variability being relatively more over Antarctic region (−40 % to 60 %) than Arctic region (−25 % to 25 %), corroborating the role of the dominant solar photoionization production process. Our analysis confirms that TEC variation at polar latitudes is a function of magnetosphere-ionosphere coupling, depending on interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) orientation and magnitude in the X ( B x Bx ), Y ( B y By ), and Z ( B z Bz ) plane. Visible enhancement in TEC is noticed in the northern polar latitude when B x < 0 Bx<0 , B y < − 6 nT By<-6\hspace{0.1667em}\text{nT} or B y > 6 nT By>6\hspace{0.1667em}\text{nT} and B z > 0 Bz>0 whereas the southern polar latitude perceives TEC enhancements with B x > 0 Bx>0 , − 6 nT < B y < 6 nT -6\hspace{0.1667em}\text{nT}<By<6\hspace{0.1667em}\text{nT} and B z < 0 Bz<0 . Further investigation reveals the intensity of phase scintillation being more pronounced than the amplitude scintillation during the disturbed geomagnetic conditions with excellent correlation with the temporal variation of TEC at both the stations. Corresponding variations in the parameters are studied in terms of particle precipitation, auroral oval expansion, Joule’s heating phenomena, and other ionospheric parameters. The studies are in line with efforts for improving ionospheric delay error and scintillation modeling and satellite-based positioning accuracies in polar latitudes.

scholarly journals Cluster observations of continuous reconnection at the magnetopause under steady interplanetary magnetic field conditions

2004 ◽  
Vol 22 (7) ◽  
pp. 2355-2367 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. D. Phan ◽  
M. W. Dunlop ◽  
G. Paschmann ◽  
B. Klecker ◽  
J. M. Bosqued ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Field ◽  
Interplanetary Magnetic Field ◽  
High Speed ◽  
Flow Speed ◽  
Plasma Jets ◽  
Current Layer ◽  
Magnetic Shear ◽  
Opposite Hemisphere ◽  
Entire Interval ◽  
Transfer Event

Abstract. On 26 January 2001, the Cluster spacecraft detected high-speed plasma jets at multiple crossings of the high-latitude duskside magnetopause (MP) and boundary layer (BL) over a period of more than 2h. The 4 spacecraft combined spent more than half of this time in the MP/BL and jets were observed whenever a spacecraft was in the MP. These observations were made under steady southward and dawnward interplanetary magnetic field (IMF) conditions. The magnetic shear across the local MP was ~100° and β~1 in the adjacent magnetosheath. The jet velocity is in remarkable agreement with reconnection prediction throughout the entire interval, except for one crossing that had no ion measurements inside the current layer. The flow speed measured in the deHoffmann Teller frame is 90% of the Alfvén speed on average for the 10 complete MP current layer crossings that are resolved by the ion measurements. These findings strongly suggest that reconnection was continuously active for more than two hours. The jets were directed persistently in the same northward and anti-sunward direction, implying that the X-line was always below the spacecraft. This feature is inconsistent with patchy and random reconnection or convecting multiple X-lines. The majority of MP/BL crossings in this two-hour interval were partial crossings, implying that they are caused by bulges sliding along the MP, not by inward-outward motion of a uniformly thin MP/BL. The presence of the bulges suggests that, although reconnection is continuously active under steady IMF conditions, its rate may be modulated. The present investigation also reveals that (1) the predicted ion D-shaped distributions are absent in all reconnection jets on this day, (2) the electric field fluctuations are larger in the reconnecting MP than in the magnetosheath proper, but their amplitudes never exceed 20mV/m, (3) the ion-electron differential motion is ~20km/s for the observed MP current density of ~50nA/m2 (∇× B), thus inconsequential for the deHoffmann-Teller and Walén analyses, (4) flows in an isolated flux transfer event (FTE) are directed in the same direction as the MP jets and satisfy the Walén relation, suggesting that this FTE is also generated by reconnection. Finally, the present event cannot be used to evaluate the validity of component or anti-parallel merging models because, although the magnetic shear at the local MP was ~100°(≪180°), the X-line may be located more than 9RE away (in the opposite hemisphere), where the shear could be substantially different.

scholarly journals The relativistic electron response in the outer radiation belt during magnetic storms

2002 ◽  
Vol 20 (7) ◽  
pp. 957-965 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. H. A. Iles ◽  
A. N. Fazakerley ◽  
A. D. Johnstone ◽  
N. P. Meredith ◽  
P. Bühler
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Field ◽  
Solar Wind ◽  
Wind Speed ◽  
Interplanetary Magnetic Field ◽  
Relativistic Electron ◽  
Radiation Belt ◽  
Solar Wind Speed ◽  
Recovery Phase ◽  
Magnetic Storms ◽  
Outer Radiation Belt

Abstract. The relativistic electron response in the outer radiation belt during magnetic storms has been studied in relation to solar wind and geomagnetic parameters during the first six months of 1995, a period in which there were a number of recurrent fast solar wind streams. The relativistic electron population was measured by instruments on board the two microsatellites, STRV-1a and STRV-1b, which traversed the radiation belt four times per day from L ~ 1 out to L ~ 7 on highly elliptical, near-equatorial orbits. Variations in the E > 750 keV and E > 1 MeV electrons during the main phase and recovery phase of 17 magnetic storms have been compared with the solar wind speed, interplanetary magnetic field z-component, Bz , the solar wind dynamic pressure and Dst *. Three different types of electron responses are identified, with outcomes that strongly depend on the solar wind speed and interplanetary magnetic field orientation during the magnetic storm recovery phase. Observations also confirm that the L-shell, at which the peak enhancement in the electron count rate occurs has a dependence on Dst *.Key words. Magnetospheric physics (energetic particles, trapped; storms and substorms) – Space plasma physics (charged particle motion and accelerations)

scholarly journals The Role of Hiss, Chorus, and EMIC Waves in the Modeling of the Dynamics of the Multi‐MeV Radiation Belt Electrons

2020 ◽  
Vol 125 (9) ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Y. Drozdov ◽  
M. E. Usanova ◽  
M. K. Hudson ◽  
H. J. Allison ◽  
Y. Y. Shprits
Keyword(s):  
Radiation Belt ◽  
Radiation Belt Electrons ◽  
Emic Waves

Cosmic ray north-south anisotropy: The role of the interplanetary magnetic field

1982 ◽  
Vol 87 (A12) ◽  
pp. 10325 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. A. Pomerantz ◽  
S. P. Duggal ◽  
A. J. Owens ◽  
M. F. Tolba ◽  
C. H. Tsao
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Field ◽  
Interplanetary Magnetic Field ◽  
Cosmic Ray
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document