scholarly journals The Atlantic Water boundary current north of Svalbard in late summer

2017 ◽  
Vol 122 (3) ◽  
pp. 2269-2290 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Dolores Pérez-Hernández ◽  
Robert S. Pickart ◽  
Vladimir Pavlov ◽  
Kjetil Våge ◽  
Randi Ingvaldsen ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Angelika Renner ◽  
Allison Bailey ◽  
Marit Reigstad ◽  
Arild Sundfjord ◽  
Sigrid Øygarden

<p>The shelf break north of Svalbard represents a major gateway for the inflow of nutrient-rich Atlantic Water (AW) to the Arctic Ocean. In this region, AW leaves the surface and subducts below Polar Surface Water (PSW). The supply of nutrients to the euphotic layer therefore varies strongly by season but also interannually, depending on e.g. rates of advection of sea ice and PSW over the AW boundary current. Additionally, the presence of sea ice can limit light availability in spring and early summer. Here, we present results from repeat sampling of hydrography, macronutrients (nitrate/nitrite, phosphate and silicic acid), and chlorophyll a along a transect at 31 E, 81.5 N in the period 2012-2017. Such time series are scarce but invaluable for investigating the range of variability in hydrography and nutrient concentrations. Measurements were done in late summer/early autumn, giving an indication of the nutrient consumption by primary producers over summer. The different years were characterised by very distinct sea ice conditions, both during the productive season and during the field campaigns. This impacted hydrography and primary production and thus nutrient concentrations in the surface and AW layers at the end of summer.</p>


2016 ◽  
Vol 46 (4) ◽  
pp. 1231-1254 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wilken-Jon von Appen ◽  
Ursula Schauer ◽  
Tore Hattermann ◽  
Agnieszka Beszczynska-Möller

AbstractThe West Spitsbergen Current (WSC) is a topographically steered boundary current that transports warm Atlantic Water northward in Fram Strait. The 16 yr (1997–2012) current and temperature–salinity measurements from moorings in the WSC at 78°50′N reveal the dynamics of mesoscale variability in the WSC and the central Fram Strait. A strong seasonality of the fluctuations and the proposed driving mechanisms is described. In winter, water is advected in the WSC that has been subjected to strong atmospheric cooling in the Nordic Seas, and as a result the stratification in the top 250 m is weak. The current is also stronger than in summer and has a greater vertical shear. This results in an e-folding growth period for baroclinic instabilities of about half a day in winter, indicating that the current has the ability to rapidly grow unstable and form eddies. In summer, the WSC is significantly less unstable with an e-folding growth period of 2 days. Observations of the eddy kinetic energy (EKE) show a peak in the boundary current in January–February when it is most unstable. Eddies are then likely advected westward, and the EKE peak is observed 1–2 months later in the central Fram Strait. Conversely, the EKE in the WSC as well as in the central Fram Strait is reduced by a factor of more than 3 in late summer. Parameterizations for the expected EKE resulting from baroclinic instability can account for the observed EKE values. Hence, mesoscale instability can generate the observed variability, and high-frequency wind forcing is not required to explain the observed EKE.


2020 ◽  
Vol 125 (8) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jianqiang Li ◽  
Robert S. Pickart ◽  
Peigen Lin ◽  
Frank Bahr ◽  
Kevin R. Arrigo ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 124 (3) ◽  
pp. 1679-1698 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Dolores Pérez‐Hernández ◽  
Robert S. Pickart ◽  
Daniel J. Torres ◽  
Frank Bahr ◽  
Arild Sundfjord ◽  
...  

Ocean Science ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 14 (5) ◽  
pp. 1147-1165 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maren Elisabeth Richter ◽  
Wilken-Jon von Appen ◽  
Claudia Wekerle

Abstract. Warm Atlantic Water (AW) flows around the Nordic Seas in a cyclonic boundary current loop. Some AW enters the Arctic Ocean where it is transformed to Arctic Atlantic Water (AAW) before exiting through the Fram Strait. There the AAW is joined by recirculating AW. Here we present the first summer synoptic study targeted at resolving this confluence in the Fram Strait which forms the East Greenland Current (EGC). Absolute geostrophic velocities and hydrography from observations in 2016, including four sections crossing the east Greenland shelf break, are compared to output from an eddy-resolving configuration of the sea ice–ocean model FESOM. Far offshore (120 km at 80.8∘ N) AW warmer than 2 ∘C is found in the northern Fram Strait. The Arctic Ocean outflow there is broad and barotropic, but gets narrower and more baroclinic toward the south as recirculating AW increases the cross-shelf-break density gradient. This barotropic to baroclinic transition appears to form the well-known EGC boundary current flowing along the shelf break farther south where it has been previously described. In this realization, between 80.2 and 76.5∘ N, the southward transport along the east Greenland shelf break increases from roughly 1 Sv to about 4 Sv and the proportion of AW to AAW also increases fourfold from 19±8 % to 80±3 %. Consequently, in the southern Fram Strait, AW can propagate into the Norske Trough on the east Greenland shelf and reach the large marine-terminating glaciers there. High instantaneous variability observed in both the synoptic data and the model output is attributed to eddies, the representation of which is crucial as they mediate the westward transport of AW in the recirculation and thus structure the confluence forming the EGC.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marika Marnela ◽  
Frank Nilsen ◽  
Ragnheid Skogseth ◽  
Kjersti Kalhagen

<p>As part of the Nansen Legacy project, waters north of Svalbard are studied. The warm and saline Atlantic water, brought northward by the West Spitsbergen Current cools and freshens as it flows eastward along the slope north of Svalbard, bringing heat and salt into the Arctic Ocean. Hydrographic CTD data are available from various cruises and databases, the main source here being the UNIS Hydrographic Database. Changes in the Atlantic water properties and its horizontal and vertical location on the slope and shelf are mapped from decadal averages of historical data from 1899 to 2018. The mean width of the boundary current following the slope eastward is estimated for five cross-shelf/slope sections from the decadal averages. An Atlantification is present from 1996-2005 to 2006-2018 with warmer and more saline water covering a larger area across the slope and reaching further east.</p>


2013 ◽  
Vol 43 (11) ◽  
pp. 2352-2371 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael A. Spall

Abstract An idealized eddy-resolving numerical model and an analytic three-layer model are used to develop ideas about what controls the circulation of Atlantic Water in the Arctic Ocean. The numerical model is forced with a surface heat flux, uniform winds, and a source of low-salinity water near the surface around the perimeter of an Arctic basin. Despite this idealized configuration, the model is able to reproduce many general aspects of the Arctic Ocean circulation and hydrography, including exchange through Fram Strait, circulation of Atlantic Water, a halocline, ice cover and transport, surface heat flux, and a Beaufort Gyre. The analytic model depends on a nondimensional number, and provides theoretical estimates of the halocline depth, stratification, freshwater content, and baroclinic shear in the boundary current. An empirical relationship between freshwater content and sea surface height allows for a prediction of the transport of Atlantic Water in the cyclonic boundary current. Parameters typical of the Arctic Ocean produce a cyclonic boundary current of Atlantic Water of O(1 − 2 Sv; where 1 Sv ≡ 106 m3 s−1) and a halocline depth of O(200 m), in reasonable agreement with observations. The theory compares well with a series of numerical model calculations in which mixing and environmental parameters are varied, thus lending credibility to the dynamics of the analytic model. In these models, lateral eddy fluxes from the boundary and vertical diffusion in the interior are important drivers of the halocline and the circulation of Atlantic Water in the Arctic Ocean.


2016 ◽  
Vol 121 (9) ◽  
pp. 6946-6960 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kjetil Våge ◽  
Robert S. Pickart ◽  
Vladimir Pavlov ◽  
Peigen Lin ◽  
Daniel J. Torres ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 25 (16) ◽  
pp. 5556-5565 ◽  
Author(s):  
Igor A. Dmitrenko ◽  
Sergey A. Kirillov ◽  
Vladimir V. Ivanov ◽  
Bert Rudels ◽  
Nuno Serra ◽  
...  

Abstract Historical hydrographic data (1940s–2010) show a distinct cross-slope difference of the lower halocline water (LHW) over the Laptev Sea continental margins. Over the slope, the LHW is on average warmer and saltier by 0.2°C and 0.5 psu, respectively, relative to the off-slope LHW. The LHW temperature time series constructed from the on-slope historical records are related to the temperature of the Atlantic Water (AW) boundary current transporting warm water from the North Atlantic Ocean. In contrast, the on-slope LHW salinity is linked to the sea ice and wind forcing over the potential upstream source region in the Barents and northern Kara Seas, as also indicated by hydrodynamic model results. Over the Laptev Sea continental margin, saltier LHW favors weaker salinity stratification that, in turn, contributes to enhanced vertical mixing with underlying AW.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrey Pnyushkov ◽  
Igor Polyakov ◽  
Robert Rember ◽  
Vladimir Ivanov ◽  
Matthew B. Alkire ◽  
...  

Abstract. This study discusses along-slope volume, heat, and salt transports derived from observations collected in 2013–15 using a cross-slope array of six moorings ranging from 250 m to 3900 m in the eastern Eurasian Basin (EB) of the Arctic Ocean. These observations demonstrate that in the upper 780 m layer, the along-slope boundary current advected, on average, 5.1 ± 0.1 Sv of water, predominantly in the eastward (shallow-to-right) direction. Monthly net volume transports across the Laptev Sea slope vary widely, from ~ 0.3 ± 0.8 in April 2014 to ~ 9.9 ± 0.8 Sv in June 2014. 3.1 ± 0.1 Sv (or 60 %) of the net transport was associated with warm and salty intermediate-depth Atlantic Water (AW). Calculated heat transport for 2013–15 (relative to −1.8 °C) was 46.0 ± 1.7 TW, and net salt transport (relative to zero salinity) was 172 ± 6 Mkg/s. Estimates for AW heat and salt transports were 32.7 ± 1.3 TW (71 % of net heat transport) and 112 ± 4 Mkg/s (65 % of net salt transport). The variability of currents explains ~ 90 % of the variability of the heat and salt transports. The remaining ~ 10 % is controlled by temperature and salinity anomalies together with temporal variability of the AW layer thickness. The annual mean volume transports decreased by 25 % from 5.8 ± 0.2 Sv in 2013–14 to 4.4 ± 0.2 Sv in 2014–15 suggesting that changes of the transports at interannual and longer time scales in the eastern EB may be significant.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document