scholarly journals On the resolution of the phase space density required to obtain a specified accuracy of the solar wind bulk velocity

2015 ◽  
Vol 120 (5) ◽  
pp. 3350-3365 ◽  
Author(s):  
John J. Podesta
2003 ◽  
Vol 21 (11) ◽  
pp. 2155-2164 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. A. Fritz ◽  
T. H. Zurbuchen ◽  
G. Gloeckler ◽  
S. Hefti ◽  
J. Chen

Abstract. The variation of the charge state of iron [Fe] ions is used to trace volume elements of plasma in the solar wind into the magnetosphere and to determine the time scales associated with the entry into and the action of the magnetospheric energization process working on these plasmas. On 2–3 May 1998 the Advanced Composition Explorer (ACE) spacecraft located at the L1 libration point observed a series of changes to the average charge state of the element Fe in the solar wind plasma reflecting variation in the coronal temperature of their original source. Over the period of these two days the average Fe charge state was observed to vary from + 15 to + 6 both at the Polar satellite in the high latitude dayside magnetosphere and at ACE. During a period of southward IMF the observations at Polar inside the magnetosphere of the same Fe charge state were simultaneous with those at ACE delayed by the measured convection speed of the solar wind to the subsolar magnetopause. Comparing the phase space density as a function of energy at both ACE and Polar has indicated that significant energization of the plasma occurred on very rapid time scales. Energization at constant phase space density by a factor of 5 to 10 was observed over a range of energy from a few keV to about 1 MeV. For a detector with a fixed energy threshold in the range from 10 keV to a few hundred keV this observed energization will appear as a factor of ~103 increase in its counting rate. Polar observations of very energetic O+ ions at the same time indicate that this energization process must be occurring in the high latitude cusp region inside the magnetosphere and that it is capable of energizing ionospheric ions at the same time.Key words. Magnetospheric physics (magnetopause, cusp, and boundary layers; magnetospheric configuration and dynamics; solar wind-magnetosphere interactions)


2006 ◽  
Vol 73 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Ferrari ◽  
R. E. Drullinger ◽  
N. Poli ◽  
F. Sorrentino ◽  
G. M. Tino

2012 ◽  
Vol 117 (A5) ◽  
pp. n/a-n/a ◽  
Author(s):  
Bingxian Luo ◽  
Xinlin Li ◽  
Weichao Tu ◽  
Jiancun Gong ◽  
Siqing Liu

2003 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 517-523 ◽  
Author(s):  
Q. H. Zhang ◽  
J. Barrette ◽  
C. Gale

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Milla Kalliokoski ◽  
Emilia Kilpua ◽  
Adnane Osmane ◽  
Allison Jaynes ◽  
Drew Turner ◽  
...  

<p>The energetic electron content in the Van Allen radiation belts surrounding the Earth can vary dramatically on timescales from minutes to days, and these electrons present a hazard for spacecraft traversing the belts. The outer belt response to solar wind driving is however yet largely unpredictable. Here we investigate the driving of the belts by sheath regions preceding interplanetary coronal mass ejections. Electron dynamics in the belts is governed by various competing acceleration, transport and loss processes. We analyzed electron phase space density to compare the energization and loss mechanisms during a geoeffective and a non-geoeffective sheath region. These two case studies indicate that ULF-driven inward and outward radial transport, together with the incursions of the magnetopause, play a key role in causing the outer belt electron flux variations. Chorus waves also likely contribute to energization during the geoeffective event. A global picture of the wave activity is achieved through a chorus proxy utilizing POES measurements. We highlight that also the non-geoeffective sheath presented distinct changes in outer belt electron fluxes, which is also evidenced by our statistical study of outer belt electron fluxes during sheath events. While not as intense as during geoeffective sheaths, significant changes in outer belt electron fluxes occur also during sheaths that do not cause major geomagnetic disturbances.</p>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document