scholarly journals DEMETER observations of high-latitude chorus waves penetrating the plasmasphere during a geomagnetic storm

2013 ◽  
Vol 40 (22) ◽  
pp. 5827-5832 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zeren Zhima ◽  
Jinbin Cao ◽  
Wenlong Liu ◽  
Huishan Fu ◽  
Junying Yang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Geomagnetic Storm ◽  
High Latitude ◽  
Chorus Waves

scholarly journals The effects of neutral inertia on ionospheric currents in the high-latitude thermosphere following a geomagnetic storm

1993 ◽  
Vol 98 (A5) ◽  
pp. 7775-7790 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. Deng ◽  
T. L. Killeen ◽  
A. G. Burns ◽  
R. G. Roble ◽  
J. A. Slavin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Geomagnetic Storm ◽  
High Latitude ◽  
Ionospheric Currents

PROBLEMS OF THE OUTER RADIATION BELT FORMATION AND TOPOLOGICAL FEATURES OF HIGH LATITUDE MAGNETOSPHERE

2021 ◽  
Vol 44 ◽  
pp. 7-11
Author(s):  
Elena Antonova ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Geomagnetic Storm ◽  
High Latitude ◽  
Radiation Belt ◽  
Ring Current ◽  
Outer Part ◽  
Auroral Oval ◽  
Plasma Pressure ◽  
Relativistic Electrons ◽  
Outer Radiation Belt ◽  
Topological Features

We analyzed the problems of formation of the outer radiation belt (ORB) taking into consideration the latest changes in our understanding of the high-latitude magnetospheric topology. This includes strong evidence that the auroral oval maps to the outer part of the ring current, meanwhile the ORB polar boundary maps inside the auroral oval. Our analysis also includes the variation of the plasma pressure distribution and the time of the acceleration of relativistic electrons during geomagnetic storm. It is shown that the maximum of ORB is formed after the geomagnetic storm in the region of plasma pressure maximum. The position of this maximum agrees with the prediction of the ORB formation theory based on the analysis of ring current development during storm. We emphasize the role of adiabatic processes in the ORB dynamics and the importance of the substorm injections during storm recovery phase for the formation of enhanced fluxes of ORB electrons after the storm.

scholarly journals Variability of Geomagnetic Field with Interplanetary Magnetic Field at Low, Mid and High Latitudes

2018 ◽  
Vol 10 (2) ◽  
pp. 133-144
Author(s):  
S. Bhardwaj ◽  
P. A. Khan ◽  
R. Atulkar ◽  
P. K. Purohit
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Field ◽  
Coronal Mass Ejection ◽  
Interplanetary Magnetic Field ◽  
Geomagnetic Storm ◽  
High Latitude ◽  
Geomagnetic Field ◽  
The State ◽  
High Latitudes ◽  
Storm Events ◽  
Mass Ejection

 The fluctuations in the Interplanetary Magnetic Field significantly affect the state of geomagnetic field particularly during the Coronal Mass Ejection (CME) events. In the present investigation we have studied the influence of Interplanetary Magnetic Field changes on the geomagnetic field components at high, low and mid latitudes. To carry out this investigation we have selected three stations viz. Alibag (18.6°N, 72.7°E), Beijing MT (40.3°N, 116.2°E) and Casey (66.2°S, 110.5°E) one each in the low, mid and high latitude regions. Then we selected geomagnetic storm events of three types namely weak (-50≤Dst≤-20), moderate (100≤Dst≤-50) and intense (Dst≤-100nT). In each storm category 10 events were considered. From our study we conclude that geomagnetic field components are significantly affected by the changes in the IMF at all the three latitudinal regions during all the storm events. At the same time we also found that the magnitude of change in geomagnetic field components is highest at the high latitudes during all types of storm events while at low and mid latitude stations the magnitude of effect is approximately the same.

High-latitude geomagnetic effects of the main phase of the geomagnetic storm of November 24, 2001 with the Northern direction of IMF

2015 ◽  
Vol 55 (2) ◽  
pp. 174-184 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. G. Kleimenova ◽  
L. I. Gromova ◽  
L. A. Dremukhina ◽  
A. E. Levitin ◽  
N. R. Zelinsky ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Geomagnetic Storm ◽  
High Latitude ◽  
Main Phase

scholarly journals High‐latitude GPS phase scintillation from E region electron density gradients during the 20–21 December 2015 geomagnetic storm

2017 ◽  
Vol 122 (7) ◽  
pp. 7473-7490 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diana Loucks ◽  
Scott Palo ◽  
Marcin Pilinski ◽  
Geoff Crowley ◽  
Irfan Azeem ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Electron Density ◽  
Geomagnetic Storm ◽  
High Latitude ◽  
Density Gradients ◽  
E Region

scholarly journals Nonlinearity in chorus waves during a geomagnetic storm on 1 November 2012

2016 ◽  
Vol 121 (1) ◽  
pp. 358-373 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Matsui ◽  
K. W. Paulson ◽  
R. B. Torbert ◽  
H. E. Spence ◽  
C. A. Kletzing ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Geomagnetic Storm ◽  
Chorus Waves

scholarly journals Analysis of the BDGIM Performance in BDS Single Point Positioning

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (19) ◽  
pp. 3888
Author(s):  
Guangxing Wang ◽  
Zhihao Yin ◽  
Zhigang Hu ◽  
Gang Chen ◽  
Wei Li ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Geomagnetic Storm ◽  
High Latitude ◽  
Single Point ◽  
Ionospheric Model ◽  
Winter Solstice ◽  
Positioning Accuracy ◽  
Single Point Positioning ◽  
Klobuchar Model ◽  
3D Positioning ◽  
Better Than

The broadcast ionospheric model is mainly used to correct the ionospheric delay error for single-frequency users. Since the BeiDou global ionospheric delay correction model (BDGIM) is a novel broadcast ionospheric model for BDS-3, its performance was analyzed through single point positioning (SPP) in this study. Twenty-two stations simultaneously receiving B1C, B2a, B1I and B3I signals were selected from the International GNSS Service (IGS) and the International GNSS Monitoring and Assessment System (iGMAS) tracking networks for the SPP experiments. The differential code bias (DCB) parameters were used to correct the hardware delays in the signals of B1C and B2a. The results showed that the BDGIM performs the best in high-latitude areas, and can effectively improve the positioning accuracy compared with the Klobuchar model. The average 3D positioning accuracy of the four civil signals can reach 3.58 m in high-latitude areas. The positioning accuracies with the BDGIM in the northern hemisphere are better than those in the southern hemisphere, and the global average 3D positioning accuracy of the four civil signals is 4.60 m. The performance of the BDGIM also shows some seasonal differences. The BDGIM performs better than the Klobuchar model on the days of spring equinox and winter solstice, while the opposite is true on the days of summer solstice and autumn equinox. On the day of winter solstice, the average 3D accuracies with the BDGIM on the signals of B1C, B2a, B1I and B3I are 4.13 m, 5.32 m, 4.40 m and 4.49 m, respectively. Although the SPP accuracies are to some extent affected by the geomagnetic storm, the BDGIM generally performs better and are more resistant to the geomagnetic storm than the Klobuchar model.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document