Transcription Factors Involved in Lineage-specific Gene Expression During Megakaryopoiesis

2003 ◽  
pp. 31-49
Author(s):  
Yulia Kaluzhny ◽  
Katya Ravid ◽  
Mortimer Poncz
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Specific Gene ◽  
Specific Gene Expression ◽  
Lineage Specific Gene

Transcription Factors Controlling Muscle-Specific Gene Expression

1993 ◽  
pp. 93-115 ◽  
Author(s):  
John J. Schwarz ◽  
James F. Martin ◽  
Eric N. Olson
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Specific Gene ◽  
Specific Gene Expression

scholarly journals Dynamic changes in cis-regulatory occupancy by Six1 and its cooperative interactions with distinct cofactors drive lineage-specific gene expression programs during progressive differentiation of the auditory sensory epithelium

2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (6) ◽  
pp. 2880-2896 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jun Li ◽  
Ting Zhang ◽  
Aarthi Ramakrishnan ◽  
Bernd Fritzsch ◽  
Jinshu Xu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Regulatory Elements ◽  
Sensory Epithelium ◽  
Hair Bundle ◽  
Specific Gene ◽  
Cell Type ◽  
Specific Gene Expression ◽  
Wide Range ◽  
Cell Type Specific ◽  
Lineage Specific Gene

Abstract The transcription factor Six1 is essential for induction of sensory cell fate and formation of auditory sensory epithelium, but how it activates gene expression programs to generate distinct cell-types remains unknown. Here, we perform genome-wide characterization of Six1 binding at different stages of auditory sensory epithelium development and find that Six1-binding to cis-regulatory elements changes dramatically at cell-state transitions. Intriguingly, Six1 pre-occupies enhancers of cell-type-specific regulators and effectors before their expression. We demonstrate in-vivo cell-type-specific activity of Six1-bound novel enhancers of Pbx1, Fgf8, Dusp6, Vangl2, the hair-cell master regulator Atoh1 and a cascade of Atoh1’s downstream factors, including Pou4f3 and Gfi1. A subset of Six1-bound sites carry consensus-sequences for its downstream factors, including Atoh1, Gfi1, Pou4f3, Gata3 and Pbx1, all of which physically interact with Six1. Motif analysis identifies RFX/X-box as one of the most significantly enriched motifs in Six1-bound sites, and we demonstrate that Six1-RFX proteins cooperatively regulate gene expression through binding to SIX:RFX-motifs. Six1 targets a wide range of hair-bundle regulators and late Six1 deletion disrupts hair-bundle polarity. This study provides a mechanistic understanding of how Six1 cooperates with distinct cofactors in feedforward loops to control lineage-specific gene expression programs during progressive differentiation of the auditory sensory epithelium.

scholarly journals Core regulatory circuitries in defining cancer cell identity across the malignant spectrum

Open Biology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (7) ◽  
pp. 200121
Author(s):  
Leila Jahangiri ◽  
Loukia Tsaprouni ◽  
Ricky M. Trigg ◽  
John A. Williams ◽  
Georgios V. Gkoutos ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Rna Polymerase ◽  
Chromatin Structure ◽  
Drug Targets ◽  
Genetic Alterations ◽  
Specific Gene ◽  
Molecular Dissection ◽  
Cell Identity ◽  
Lineage Specific Gene

Gene expression programmes driving cell identity are established by tightly regulated transcription factors that auto- and cross-regulate in a feed-forward manner, forming core regulatory circuitries (CRCs). CRC transcription factors create and engage super-enhancers by recruiting acetylation writers depositing permissive H3K27ac chromatin marks. These super-enhancers are largely associated with BET proteins, including BRD4, that influence higher-order chromatin structure. The orchestration of these events triggers accessibility of RNA polymerase machinery and the imposition of lineage-specific gene expression. In cancers, CRCs drive cell identity by superimposing developmental programmes on a background of genetic alterations. Further, the establishment and maintenance of oncogenic states are reliant on CRCs that drive factors involved in tumour development. Hence, the molecular dissection of CRC components driving cell identity and cancer state can contribute to elucidating mechanisms of diversion from pre-determined developmental programmes and highlight cancer dependencies. These insights can provide valuable opportunities for identifying and re-purposing drug targets. In this article, we review the current understanding of CRCs across solid and liquid malignancies and avenues of investigation for drug development efforts. We also review techniques used to understand CRCs and elaborate the indication of discussed CRC transcription factors in the wider context of cancer CRC models.

Characterization of hematopoietic lineage-specific gene expression by ES cell in vitro differentiation induction system

Blood ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 95 (3) ◽  
pp. 870-878 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takumi Era ◽  
Toshiaki Takagi ◽  
Tomomi Takahashi ◽  
Jean-Christophe Bories ◽  
Toru Nakano
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Cell Lines ◽  
Embryonic Stem ◽  
Experimental System ◽  
Specific Gene ◽  
Specific Gene Expression ◽  
Differentiation Induction ◽  
Lineage Specific Gene ◽  
Megakaryocytic Cell

The continuous generation of mature blood cells from hematopoietic progenitor cells requires a highly complex series of molecular events. To examine lineage-specific gene expression during the differentiation process, we developed a novel method combiningLacZ reporter gene analysis with in vitro hematopoietic differentiation induction from mouse embryonic stem cells. For a model system using this method, we chose the erythroid and megakaryocytic differentiation pathways. Although erythroid and megakaryocytic cells possess distinct functional and morphologic features, these 2 lineages originate from bipotential erythro-megakaryocytic progenitors and share common lineage-restricted transcription factors. A portion of the 5′ flanking region of the human glycoprotein IIb (IIb) integrin gene extending from base −598 to base +33 was examined in detail. As reported previously, this region is sufficient for megakaryocyte-specific gene expression. However, previous reports that used human erythro-megakaryocytic cell lines suggested that one or more negative regulatory regions were necessary for megakaryocyte-specific gene expression. Our data clearly showed that an approximately 200-base enhancer region extending from −598 to −400 was sufficient for megakaryocyte-specific gene expression. This experimental system has advantages over those using erythro-megakaryocytic cell lines because it recapitulates normal hematopoietic cell development and differentiation. Furthermore, this system is more efficient than transgenic analysis and can easily examine gene expression with null mutations of specific genes.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document