Growth Hormone Pulse-Activated STAT5 Signalling: A Unique Regulatory Mechanism Governing Sexual Dimorphism of Liver Gene Expression

Author(s):  
David J. Waxman
Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 266-266
Author(s):  
Joshua H. Wong ◽  
Robert E. Levy ◽  
Jonathan Dukes ◽  
Sara A. Mason ◽  
Brandon Sos ◽  
...  

Abstract Clinical reports suggest significant sex differences in risk for thrombosis-related diseases such as myocardial infarction, stroke, and venous thromboembolism. However, little is known about mechanism for such differences. There is a well-described sexual dimorphism in liver protein synthesis that is growth hormone (GH) dependent. GH secretion from the pituitary is itself highly sexually dimorphic with males (M) secreting in a pulsatile (P) and females (F) a continuous (C) fashion. These patterns induce M- and F-specific signatures of liver gene expression. In the past, we and others have observed significant sex differences in murine thrombosis models. Given that most coagulation proteases and inhibitors are synthesized or modified in the liver, we aimed to test whether sex-specific GH secretion patterns contribute to the observed sex differences in thrombosis. We measured whole blood clotting times (WCT), thrombosis susceptibility in the thromboplastin-mediated pulmonary embolism (PE) model, and hemostasis in the tail bleeding time (BT) model in M and F control (WT) and GH-deficient “little” (LIT) mice. We observed that WT Fs had longer WCTs (mean time 61.38 vs. 56.72 sec) and were significantly protected in the PE model (median survival 232.5 vs 165 sec) as compared to M. There were no differences in the BT model across all experiments. Interestingly, F and M LIT animals both had significantly prolonged WCTs (67.56 and 67.30 sec, respectively) and were substantially protected in the PE model (median survival 900 and 1200 sec) as compared to WT. Next, LIT animals were injected twice daily with GH to simulate the P pattern of GH secretion (LIT+). This resulted in a significant shortening of the F and M WCTs back to WT M levels (53.16 and 50.97 sec). A group of F WT animals were also injected with M pattern GH (WT+). This too resulted in significant shortening of the F WCTs (54.10 sec). To explore for possible mechanisms underlying these differences, we measured activity of coagulation factors II, V, VII, VIII, IX, X, and XI. The average of all factor activity levels was significantly higher in WT M vs F (100 vs. 81.99%), significantly lower and in both M and F LIT (60.85 and 57.97%), and increased to WT M levels in M and F LIT+ animals (106.6 and 99%). To determine whether these changes were mediated by changes in liver gene expression, we measured a panel of 30 coagulation protease and inhibitor genes in liver and vascular tissue by Taqman®. Surprisingly, we found no significant differences in coagulation factor expression, but found that expression of TFPI was significantly increased in F vs M WT vasculature (9431 vs. 7678 gene copy number (GCN)). Expression was increased in M and F LIT animals (10350 and 11710 GCN) and fell to below WT levels in M and F LIT+ animals (4534 and 4194 GCN). These results indicate that sex differences in thrombosis in mice are at least in part mediated by sex differences in GH secretion with F mice relatively protected as compared to M. M and F GH-deficient LIT mice are similarly protected as compared to WT M. Repletion of GH in a P pattern reverts M and F LIT and F WT mice to WT M levels. Finally, P GH secretion may promote increased thrombosis through inhibition of TFPI in the vasculature. This represents a novel mechanism underlying these sex-differences in thrombosis mediated by sexually dimorphic GH secretion and its effect on regulation of TFPI in the vasculature.


Endocrinology ◽  
1991 ◽  
Vol 128 (5) ◽  
pp. 2369-2375 ◽  
Author(s):  
JESUS ARGENTE ◽  
JULIE A. CHOWEN ◽  
PHILIP ZEITLER ◽  
DONALD K. CLIFTON ◽  
ROBERT A. STEINER

Endocrinology ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 156 (3) ◽  
pp. 1040-1051 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Cecilia Ramirez ◽  
Ana Maria Ornstein ◽  
Guillermina Maria Luque ◽  
Maria Ines Perez Millan ◽  
Isabel Garcia-Tornadu ◽  
...  

Abstract Liver sexual gene dimorphism, which depends mainly on specific patterns of GH secretion, may underlie differential susceptibility to some liver diseases. Because GH and prolactin secretion are regulated by dopaminergic pathways, we studied the participation of brain and lactotrope dopamine 2 receptors (D2Rs) on liver gene sexual dimorphism, to explore a link between the brain and liver gene expression. We used global D2R knockout mice (Drd2−/−) and conducted a functional dissection strategy based on cell-specific Drd2 inactivation in neurons (neuroDrd2KO) or pituitary lactotropes. Disruption of neuronal D2Rs (which impaired the GH axis) decreased most of male or female-predominant class I liver genes and increased female–predominant class II genes in males, consistent with the positive (class I) or negative (class II) regulation of these genes by GH. Notably, sexual dimorphism was lost for class I and II genes in neuroDrd2KO mice. Disruption of lactotrope D2Rs did not modify class I or II genes in either sex, because GH axis was preserved. But surprisingly, 1 class II gene (Prlr) and female-predominant class I genes were markedly up-regulated in lacDrd2KO females, pointing to direct or indirect effects of prolactin in the regulation of selected female-predominant liver genes. This suggestion was strengthened in the hyperprolactinemic Drd2−/− female mouse, in which increased expression of the same 4 liver genes was observed, despite a decreased GH axis. We hereby demonstrate endocrine-mediated D2R actions on sexual dimorphic liver gene expression, which may be relevant during chronic dopaminergic medications in psychiatric disease.


1997 ◽  
Vol 94 (14) ◽  
pp. 7239-7244 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. B. Udy ◽  
R. P. Towers ◽  
R. G. Snell ◽  
R. J. Wilkins ◽  
S.-H. Park ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Leandro Fernández-Pérez ◽  
Mercedes de Mirecki-Garrido ◽  
Carlota Recio ◽  
Borja Guerra

2006 ◽  
Vol 20 (11) ◽  
pp. 2613-2629 ◽  
Author(s):  
David J. Waxman ◽  
Caitlin O’Connor

1993 ◽  
Vol 33 ◽  
pp. S27-S27
Author(s):  
H A Delemarre-van de Waal ◽  
K A Burton ◽  
E B Kabigting ◽  
D K Clifton ◽  
R A Steiner

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document