scholarly journals Pubic Hair Grooming Prevalence and Motivation Among Women in the United States

2016 ◽  
Vol 152 (10) ◽  
pp. 1106 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tami S. Rowen ◽  
Thomas W. Gaither ◽  
Mohannad A. Awad ◽  
E. Charles Osterberg ◽  
Alan W. Shindel ◽  
...  
2017 ◽  
Vol 153 (11) ◽  
pp. 1114 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew D. Truesdale ◽  
E. Charles Osterberg ◽  
Thomas W. Gaither ◽  
Mohannad A. Awad ◽  
Molly A. Elmer-DeWitt ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 620-640 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas W. Gaither ◽  
Mohannad A. Awad ◽  
E. Charles Osterberg ◽  
Tami S. Rowen ◽  
Alan W. Shindel ◽  
...  

Pubic hair grooming is a growing phenomenon and is associated with body image and sexual activity. A nationally representative survey of noninstitutionalized adults aged 18 to 65 years residing in the United States was conducted. Differences in demographic and sexual characteristics between groomers and nongroomers were explored. Four thousand one hundred and ninety-eight men completed the survey. Of these men, 2,120 (50.5%) reported regular pubic hair grooming. The prevalence of grooming decreases with age, odds ratio = 0.95 (95% confidence interval [0.94, 0.96]), p < .001. Adjusting for sexual frequency and sexual orientation, grooming is associated with performing and receiving oral sex. The majority of men report grooming in preparation for sexual activity with a peak prevalence of 73% among men aged 25 to 34 years, followed by hygiene (61%) and routine care (44%). The majority of men who remove their pubic hair groom the hair above the penis (87%), followed by the scrotum (66%) and the penile shaft (57%). Overall, pubic hair grooming is common among men aged 18 to 65 years in the United States. Younger ages are associated with greater rates of pubic hair grooming. Many men groom for sex, in particular oral sex, as well as for routine care and hygiene.


2016 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. S254
Author(s):  
T.S. Rowen ◽  
T.W. Gaither ◽  
M.A. Awad ◽  
C. Osterberg ◽  
A.W. Shindel ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 678-685 ◽  
Author(s):  
Debby Herbenick ◽  
Devon Hensel ◽  
Nicole K. Smith ◽  
Vanessa Schick ◽  
Michael Reece ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 7 (10) ◽  
pp. 3322-3330 ◽  
Author(s):  
Debra Herbenick ◽  
Vanessa Schick ◽  
Michael Reece ◽  
Stephanie Sanders ◽  
J. Dennis Fortenberry

Author(s):  
A. Hakam ◽  
J.T. Gau ◽  
M.L. Grove ◽  
B.A. Evans ◽  
M. Shuman ◽  
...  

Prostate adenocarcinoma is the most common malignant tumor of men in the United States and is the third leading cause of death in men. Despite attempts at early detection, there will be 244,000 new cases and 44,000 deaths from the disease in the United States in 1995. Therapeutic progress against this disease is hindered by an incomplete understanding of prostate epithelial cell biology, the availability of human tissues for in vitro experimentation, slow dissemination of information between prostate cancer research teams and the increasing pressure to “ stretch” research dollars at the same time staff reductions are occurring.To meet these challenges, we have used the correlative microscopy (CM) and client/server (C/S) computing to increase productivity while decreasing costs. Critical elements of our program are as follows:1) Establishing the Western Pennsylvania Genitourinary (GU) Tissue Bank which includes >100 prostates from patients with prostate adenocarcinoma as well as >20 normal prostates from transplant organ donors.


Author(s):  
Vinod K. Berry ◽  
Xiao Zhang

In recent years it became apparent that we needed to improve productivity and efficiency in the Microscopy Laboratories in GE Plastics. It was realized that digital image acquisition, archiving, processing, analysis, and transmission over a network would be the best way to achieve this goal. Also, the capabilities of quantitative image analysis, image transmission etc. available with this approach would help us to increase our efficiency. Although the advantages of digital image acquisition, processing, archiving, etc. have been described and are being practiced in many SEM, laboratories, they have not been generally applied in microscopy laboratories (TEM, Optical, SEM and others) and impact on increased productivity has not been yet exploited as well.In order to attain our objective we have acquired a SEMICAPS imaging workstation for each of the GE Plastic sites in the United States. We have integrated the workstation with the microscopes and their peripherals as shown in Figure 1.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document